Mary, Mary, quite contrary

作者: Simone T.A. Phipps

DOI: 10.1108/17511341111141350

关键词:

摘要: Purpose – This paper aims to depict the pivotal roles played by Mary Parker Follett and Barnett Gilson, as they uniquely contributed early management thought, theory, practice through “spirituality” despite chauvinism of their day.Design/methodology/approach Synthesizing articles from history journals, writings about figures interest, annals, published works themselves, other resources; this illustrates how input Gilson made distinctive valuable contributions field.Findings research concludes that although mid‐nineteenth mid‐twentieth century, when men were dominant in any arena relating management, responsive “spiritual” insight its contrariness credence day. Consequently, initiated an understanding significantly impacted theory practice. Their perceptive revelations also led changing mindsets actions tha...

参考文章(35)
Richard A. Feiss, Personal Relationship as a Basis of Scientific Management Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science. ,vol. 65, pp. 27- 56 ,(1916) , 10.1177/000271621606500105
Lindy Biggs, Daniel Nelson, A mental revolution: scientific management since Taylor Technology and Culture. ,vol. 35, pp. 427- ,(1994) , 10.2307/3106324
Daniel A. Wren, The History of Management Thought ,(2004)
Julianne Cicarelli, James Cicarelli, Distinguished Women Economists ,(2003)
Michael C. Wood, John Cunningham Wood, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth: critical evaluations in business and management Routledge. ,(2003)
Mary Barnett Gilson, What's Past Is Prologue ,(2007)
Katherine Selber, David M. Austin, Mary Parker Follett: epilogue to or return of a social work management pioneer? Administration in Social Work. ,vol. 21, pp. 1- 15 ,(1997) , 10.1300/J147V21N01_01