Fire Effects on Wildlife in the Central Hardwoods and Appalachian Regions, USA

作者: Craig A. Harper , W. Mark Ford , Marcus A. Lashley , Christopher E. Moorman , Michael C. Stambaugh

DOI: 10.4996/FIREECOLOGY.1202127

关键词:

摘要: Fire is being prescribed and used increasingly to promote ecosystem restoration (e.g., oak woodlands savannas) manage wildlife habitat in the Central Hardwoods Appalachian regions, USA. However, questions persist as how fire affects hardwood forest communities associated wildlife, should be achieve management goals. We provide an up-to-date review of effects on various species their Appalachians. Documented direct (i.e., mortality) are rare. Indirect changes quality) influenced greatly by light availability, frequency, intensity. Unless intensity great enough kill a portion overstory, burning closed-canopy forests has provided little benefit for most region because it doesn’t result sunlight penetration elicit understory response. Canopy reduction through silvicultural treatment enabled managers use more effectively. must kept low hardwoods limit damage many overstory trees. wounding or killing trees with benefits allowing increased stimulate response, snag subsequent cavity creation, additions large coarse woody debris. In general, fire-return interval 2 yr 7 wide variety providing diverse structure understory; increasing browse, forage, soft mast; creating snags cavities. Historically, dormant-season was prevalent these still when implemented systems burn-days relatively few growing season May August shading from leaf cover high fuel moisture. Late growing-season increases window burning, better control composition possible. Early may pose risk some species, especially herpetofauna recently emerged winter hibernacula (April) songbirds that nest (May June). negative population-level unlikely unless burned area early continually. did not find evidence leading population declines any including Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed Indiana bat [Myotis sodalis Mill. Allen] northern long-eared [M. septentrionalis Trouess.]). Instead, data indicate can enhance bats suitability foraging day-roost sites. Similarly, concern over displacement woodland salamanders (Plethodontidae), another taxa heightened conservation concern, alleviated along ecologically appropriate aspect slope gradients forced into mesic, site index environments where common. Because topography across Appalachians diverse, we contend applying positions best suited effective approach increase regional landscape heterogeneity biological diversity. Herein, offer prescriptive concepts guilds

参考文章(138)
William J McShea, William M Healy, None, Oak forest ecosystems: ecology and management for wildlife. Oak forest ecosystems: ecology and management for wildlife.. ,(2002)
Ronald A. Canterbury, David A. Buehler, Paul B. Hamel, John L. Confer, William C. Hunter, Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America Wildlife Society Bulletin. 29 (2): 440-455. [Editor's note: Paul B. Hamel, Southern Research Station scientist, co-authored this publication.]. ,(2001)
Steven J. Beaupre, Lara E. Douglas, Responses of timber rattlesnakes to fire: Lessons from two prescribed burns In: Dey, Daniel C.; Stambaugh, Michael C.; Clark, Stacy L.; Schweitzer, Callie J., eds. Proceedings of the 4th fire in eastern oak forests conference; 2011 May 17-19; Springfield, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-102. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 192-204.. pp. 192- 204 ,(2012)
Michael J. Lacki, Daniel R. Cox, Matthew B. Dickinson, Fire and the endangered Indiana bat In: Hutchinson, Todd F., ed. Proceedings of the 3rd fire in eastern oak forests conference; 2008 May 20-22; Carbondale, IL. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-46. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 51-75.. ,(2009)
LA Brennan, RT Engstrom, WE Palmer, SM Hermann, GA Hurst, LW Burger, CL Hardy, Whither wildlife without fire Transactions of the 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources conference; 1998 March 20-25; Orlando, FL. Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute: 402-414.. ,(1998)
M.R. Pelton, F.T. Van Manen, A GIS model to predict black bear habitat use Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 95, pp. 6- 12 ,(1997)
David J. Sausville, Donald J. Schwab, Patrick D. Keyser, Partick H. Brose, W. Mark Ford, Prescribed Fire Impacts to Amphibians and Reptiles in Shelterwood-harvested Oak-dominated Forests Virginia journal of science. ,vol. 55, pp. 2- ,(2004) , 10.25778/BNZF-1K41
Callie Jo Schweitzer, Daniel C. Dey, Timing fire to minimize damage in managing oak ecosystems In Proceedings of the 17th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e–Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–203. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 11 p.. ,vol. 2015, pp. 143- 153 ,(2015)
G.W. Wendel, H. Clay Smith, H. Clay Smith, Effects of prescribed fire in a central Appalachian oak-hickory stand NE-RP-594. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p.. ,vol. 594, ,(1986) , 10.2737/NE-RP-594