Evaluating Informational Inputs in Rulemaking Processes: A Cross-Case Analysis

作者: Deserai A. Crow , Elizabeth A. Albright , Elizabeth Koebele

DOI: 10.1177/0095399715581040

关键词:

摘要: As legislative venues are increasingly stymied by gridlock, much policymaking responsibility has devolved to the U.S. states. This article analyzes informational inputs and participation actors within rulemaking context, focusing on level of state rulemaking. Specifically, we explore process in Colorado North Carolina two environmental sectors. Using data from documents in-depth interviews, this study finds that goals deliberative open regulatory processes not met cases studied here, part due informal pre-hearing established agencies which can be navigated most successfully regulated community.

参考文章(45)
Cynthia Weston, Terry Gandell, Jacinthe Beauchamp, Lynn McAlpine, Carol Wiseman, Cathy Beauchamp, Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System Qualitative Sociology. ,vol. 24, pp. 381- 400 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1010690908200
Stuart Shapiro, Debra Borie-Holtz, The Politics of Regulatory Reform ,(2013)
Paul Eric Teske, Regulation in the States ,(2004)
Marc Allen Eisner, Jeff Worsham, Evan J. Ringquist, Contemporary Regulatory Policy ,(1999)
Greg Hampton, Environmental equity and public participation Policy Sciences. ,vol. 32, pp. 163- 174 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1004591620163
A. Michael Huberman, Matthew B. Miles, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook ,(1994)
Christina Mangurian, Lisa A Bero, Theresa Montini, Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: the case of Maryland. Public Health Reports. ,vol. 117, pp. 291- 298 ,(2002) , 10.1093/PHR/117.3.291
Katrina Smith Korfmacher, Tomas M. Koontz, Collaboration, information, and preservation: The role of expertise in farmland preservation task forces Policy Sciences. ,vol. 36, pp. 213- 236 ,(2003) , 10.1023/B:OLIC.0000017465.67811.6D