Light interactions, use and efficiency in row crop canopies under optimal growth conditions

作者: M.S. Kukal , S. Irmak

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2019.107887

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Accurate estimates of light (Photosynthetically Active Radiation or PAR) absorption, in addition to other interactions is imperative quantify growth, productivity, energy and water balance physiological biophysical processes any vegetative surface. Currently, a comparative assessment interaction patterns across row crops lacking, especially under current levels productivity achieved the U.S. High Plains. Here, we continuously measured canopy components at high-frequency (15 min) characterize transmittance (R), reflectance fraction intercepted PAR (fIPAR), absorbed (fAPAR), extinction coefficients (k), use efficiency (LUE) comparatively maize, soybean, sorghum winter wheat optimal growth conditions. While maximum fAPAR was 88-96% incoming all crops, mean varied from 82% 46% wheat; while k ranged 0.36 (winter wheat) 0.48 (sorghum soybean), these differences reflect highly crop-specific signatures. Conversion factors among fIPAR LUE based on either component (LUEi LUEa) were quantified that substantially different conventionally used values; during early late stages. A commonly employed approach solar-noon sampling evaluated, it found stages crop experience greater potential errors (as high as 110%) this approach, hence should be avoided. LUEa highest for maize (5.3 g MJ−1), followed by (4.1 (4.0 MJ−1) soybean (3.1 MJ−1). The datasets measured, analyzed interpreted here present unprecedented quantities biomass parameters four major cropping systems, hence, accounted modeling applications enhance predictive accuracy robustness.

参考文章(76)
Thomas R. Sinclair, Russell C. Muchow, Radiation Use Efficiency Advances in Agronomy. ,vol. 65, pp. 215- 265 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60914-1
C.T. De Wit, Potential photosynthesis of crop surfaces. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 141- 149 ,(1959) , 10.18174/NJAS.V7I2.17686
D.J. Watson, The Physiological Basis of Variation in Yield Advances in Agronomy. ,vol. 4, pp. 101- 145 ,(1952) , 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7
J.R. Kiniry, P.T. Dyke, C. Allan Jones, CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development Texas AandM University Press. ,(1986)
M.G. O’Connell, G.J. O’Leary, D.M. Whitfield, D.J. Connor, Interception of photosynthetically active radiation and radiation-use efficiency of wheat, field pea and mustard in a semi-arid environment Field Crops Research. ,vol. 85, pp. 111- 124 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00156-4
S. Irmak, Nebraska Water and Energy Flux Measurement, Modeling, and Research Network (NEBFLUX) Transactions of the ASABE. ,vol. 53, pp. 1097- 1115 ,(2010) , 10.13031/2013.32600
S. Pradhan, V.K. Sehgal, D.K. Das, A.K. Jain, K.K. Bandyopadhyay, R. Singh, P.K. Sharma, Effect of weather on seed yield and radiation and water use efficiency of mustard cultivars in a semi-arid environment Agricultural Water Management. ,vol. 139, pp. 43- 52 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.AGWAT.2014.03.005
G MCMASTER, Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. ,vol. 87, pp. 291- 300 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0
Mari-Vaughn V. Johnson, James R. Kiniry, Byron L. Burson, Ceptometer Deployment Method Affects Measurement of Fraction of Intercepted Photosynthetically Active Radiation Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 102, pp. 1132- 1137 ,(2010) , 10.2134/AGRONJ2009.0478
M.I. Vieira, J.P. de Melo-Abreu, M.E. Ferreira, A.A. Monteiro, Dry matter and area partitioning, radiation interception and radiation-use efficiency in open-field bell pepper. Scientia Horticulturae. ,vol. 121, pp. 404- 409 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2009.03.007