Variability in diagnostic opinion among pathologists for single small atypical foci in prostate biopsies.

作者: Theodorus H. Van der Kwast , Andrew Evans , Gina Lockwood , Doug Tkachuk , David G. Bostwick

DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0B013E3181C7997B

关键词:

摘要: Pathologists are increasingly exposed to prostate biopsies with small atypical foci, requiring differentiation between adenocarcinoma, acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy, and a benign diagnosis. We studied the level of agreement such foci among experts in urologic pathology all-round reference pathologists European Randomized Screening study Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). For this purpose, we retrieved 20 (most <1 mm) foci. Hematoxylin eosin- stained slides, including 10 immunostained slides were digita- lized virtual microscopy. The lesional area was not marked. Five 7 ERSPC examined cases. Multirater k statistics applied determine significant differences pathologists. value (0.39; confidence interval, 0.29-0.49) significantly higher than that (0.21; 0.14-0.27). Full (100%) reached by 5 biopsies. Experts rendered diagnoses ranging from adenocarcinoma on same biopsy 9 biopsies, respectively. Most these lesions comprised 2 glands. diagnosed (49%) more often (32%) (P<0.001). As particularly poor comprising <6 glands, would encourage obtain intercollegial con- sultation specialized pathologist before carcinoma diagnosis, whereas clinicians may consider perform staging engaging deferred or definite therapy.

参考文章(22)
Renske Postma, Fritz H. Schröder, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, Robert F. Hoedemaeker, Andre N. Vis, Monique J. Roobol, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening. European Urology. ,vol. 52, pp. 89- 97 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2007.01.030
Richard J. Zarbo, David A. Novis, Paul A. Valenstein, Diagnostic Uncertainty Expressed in Prostate Needle Biopsies Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 123, pp. 687- 692 ,(1999) , 10.5858/1999-123-0687-DUEIPN
Kenneth A. Iczkowski, Gregory T. MacLennan, David G. Bostwick, Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1489- 1495 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00012
Jeffrey L. Fine, Dana M. Grzybicki, Russell Silowash, Jonhan Ho, John R. Gilbertson, Leslie Anthony, Robb Wilson, Anil V. Parwani, Sheldon I. Bastacky, Jonathan I. Epstein, Drazen M. Jukic, Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies Human Pathology. ,vol. 39, pp. 564- 572 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.HUMPATH.2007.08.007
Theodorus H. Van der Kwast, Tineke Wolters, Andrew Evans, Monique Roobol, Single Prostatic Cancer Foci on Prostate Biopsy European Urology Supplements. ,vol. 7, pp. 549- 556 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EURSUP.2007.09.001
Peter A. Humphrey, Complete histologic serial sectioning of a prostate gland with adenocarcinoma. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 17, pp. 468- 472 ,(1993) , 10.1097/00000478-199305000-00005
Rensbe Postma, Shijn H. de Vries, Monique J. Roobol, Mark F. Wildhagen, Fritz H. Schröder, Theo H. van der Kwast, Incidence and Follow-Up of Patients with Focal Prostate Carcinoma in 2 Screening Rounds After an Interval of 4 Years Cancer. ,vol. 103, pp. 708- 716 ,(2005) , 10.1002/CNCR.20840
Mehsati Herawi, Anil V Parwani, Junji Irie, Jonathan I Epstein, Small glandular proliferations on needle biopsies: most common benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma sent in for expert second opinion. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. ,vol. 29, pp. 874- 880 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.PAS.0000159520.36806.3E
Henrik O. Helin, Mikael E. Lundin, Mervi Laakso, Johan Lundin, Heikki J. Helin, Jorma Isola, Virtual Microscopy in Prostate Histopathology: Simultaneous Viewing of Biopsies Stained Sequentially With Hematoxylin and Eosin, and α-Methylacyl-Coenzyme A Racemase/p63 Immunohistochemistry The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 175, pp. 495- 499 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00164-3