The Split-Up Project: Induction, Context and Knowledge Discovery in Law

作者: J. Zeleznikow

DOI: 10.1093/LPR/3.2.147

关键词:

摘要: Most legal decision support systems have generally operated in domains with well-understood norms. Hence reasoning has been represented by a combination of rule-based and case-based reasoning. However, we analyse which makers are allowed significant amount discretion. We argue that if the domain is bounded, sufficient number commonplace cases exist, then can be modelled using Knowledge Discovery from Databases techniques. Whilst focus upon principles for making discretionary domains, our goal to develop theory constructing systems. Our jurisprudential hence applied practical - namely distribution marital property following divorce Australia. conclude discussing how maintain, update evaluate quality advice offered

参考文章(36)
John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri, Modelling discretion in the Split Up system pacific asia conference on information systems. pp. 31- ,(1997)
H. L. A. Hart *, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals Korean Journal of Legal Philosophy. ,vol. 8, pp. 63- 99 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9781315092003-5
Andrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow, WebShell: The development of web based expert systems Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVIII. pp. 245- 258 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4471-0119-2_19
Richard Ingleby, Family law and society ,(1993)
Janet Kolodner, Case-based reasoning ,(1993)
Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument Springer Netherlands. ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-94-015-8975-8
John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri, Knowledge discovery for decision support in law international conference on information systems. pp. 635- 639 ,(2000) , 10.5555/359640.359917