New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants

作者: Sanjay Kumar Sanjay Kumar , PK Choudhury , MD Carro , GW Griffith , SS Dagar

DOI: 10.1007/S00253-013-5365-0

关键词:

摘要: The growing demand for sustainable animal production is compelling researchers to explore the potential approaches reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from livestock that are mainly produced by enteric fermentation. Some solutions, instance, use chemical inhibitors methanogenesis, not feasible in routine due their toxicity ruminants, inhibition efficient rumen function or other transitory effects. Strategies, such as plant secondary metabolites and dietary manipulations have emerged methane emission, but these still require extensive research before can be recommended deployed industry sector. Furthermore, immunization vaccines methanogens phages also under investigation mitigation methanogenesis. increasing knowledge methanogenic diversity rumen, DNA sequencing technologies bioinformatics paved way chemogenomic strategies targeting producers. Chemogenomics will help finding target enzymes proteins, which further assist screening natural well inhibitors. construction a gene catalogue through an attainable objective. This lead understand microbiome function, its relation with host feeds, therefore, form basis practically viable eco-friendly approaches, while improving ruminant productivity.

参考文章(162)
S. A. Martin, M. N. Streeter, Effect of malate on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 73, pp. 2141- 2145 ,(1995) , 10.2527/1995.7372141X
Woodward Sl, Lassey Kr, Ulyatt Mj, Waghorn Gc, Early indications that feeding Lotus will reduce methane emissions from ruminants Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. ,vol. 61, pp. 23- 26 ,(2001)
C. Saro, I. Mateos, J. M. Ranilla, María Dolores Carro Travieso, C. Kamel, M. L. Tejido, The influence of diet on the effectiveness of garlic oil and cinnamaldehyde to manipulate in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production. Animal Production Science, ISSN 1836-0939, 2013, Vol. 53, No. 4. ,(2013)
Devki Nandan Kamra, Mahesh Pawar, Beddyuti Singh, Effect of Plant Secondary Metabolites on Rumen Methanogens and Methane Emissions by Ruminants Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 351- 370 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-94-007-3926-0_12
S. A. Martin, J. M. Macy, Effects of Monensin, Pyromellitic Diimide and 2-Bromoethanesulfonic Acid on Rumen Fermentation In Vitro Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 60, pp. 544- 550 ,(1985) , 10.2527/JAS1985.602544X
L Allam, T Aluwong, PA Wuyep, Livestock-environment interactions: Methane emissions from ruminants African Journal of Biotechnology. ,vol. 10, pp. 1265- 1269 ,(2011) , 10.4314/AJB.V10I8
G. Rebitzer, T. Ekvall, R. Frischknecht, D. Hunkeler, G. Norris, T. Rydberg, W.-P. Schmidt, S. Suh, B.P. Weidema, D.W. Pennington, Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications Environment International. ,vol. 30, pp. 701- 720 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2003.11.005
K. A. Beauchemin, S. M. McGinn, METHANE EMISSIONS FROM BEEF CATTLE: EFFECTS OF FUMARIC ACID, ESSENTIAL OIL AND CANOLA OIL Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 84, pp. 1489- 1496 ,(2006) , 10.2527/2006.8461489X