A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

作者: M L Slevin , P I Clark , S P Joel , S Malik , R J Osborne

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1333

关键词:

摘要: Etoposide is an increasingly used and well-tolerated drug in cancer medicine. Its cytotoxic action phase-specific it has demonstrated schedule dependency both vitro animal studies, but clinical evidence of the importance scheduling uncertain. The two administration schedules etoposide that have been compared this randomized study 39 patients with previously untreated extensive small-cell lung treated single-agent were 500 mg/m2 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours or five consecutive daily 2-hour infusions each 100 mg/m2. Both regimens repeated every 3 weeks, for maximum six cycles. Patients received combination chemotherapy vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (VAC) radiotherapy on failure to respond at relapse, depending their Karnofsky performance status. same therapy was arms study. All are evaluable response etoposide. In 24-hour arm, achieved partial remission, resulting overall rate 10%. 5-day schedule, 16 had one complete producing 89%, which significantly superior arm (P less than .001). median duration remission 4.5 months. Bone marrow toxicity similar schedules. pharmacokinetics measured all patients, total areas under concentration versus time curves (AUCs) equivalent regimens. This clearly humans, superiority infusion. using efficacious determined be excess 80%.

参考文章(21)
Nick Thatcher, William P Steward, Peter M Wilkinson, J M Edmundson, W Shiu, Etoposide infusions for treatment of metastatic lung cancer. Cancer treatment reports. ,vol. 68, pp. 897- 899 ,(1984)
D H Johnson, M J DeLeo, K R Hande, S N Wolff, J D Hainsworth, F A Greco, High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 5, pp. 703- 709 ,(1987) , 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.5.703
Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Derek Raghavan, B.J. Kennedy, VP-16-213 (etoposide): The mandrake root from Issyk-Kul☆ The American Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 136- 144 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90600-3
F.C. Schell, H.Y. Yap, G.N. Hortobagyi, B. Issell, L. Esparza, Phase II study of VP16-213 (Etoposide) in refractory metastatic breast carcinoma Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 7, pp. 223- 225 ,(1982) , 10.1007/BF00254555
Henrik Roed, Lars L. Vindelov, Ib J. Christensen, Mogens Spang-Thomsen, Heine Hoi Hansen, The effect of the two epipodophyllotoxin derivatives etoposide (VP-16) and teniposide (VM-26) on cell lines established from patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 19, pp. 16- 20 ,(1987) , 10.1007/BF00296248
V.J. Harvey, M.L. Slevin, S.P. Joel, M.M. Smythe, A. Johnston, P.F.M. Wrigley, Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1315- 1319 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0277-5379(85)90310-4
S.N. Wolff, W.W. Grosh, K. Prater, K.R. Hande, In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of VP-16-213 and implications for chemotherapy. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. ,vol. 19, pp. 246- 249 ,(1987) , 10.1007/BF00252980
Per Dombernowsky, Nis I. Nissen, Schedule dependency of the antileukemic activity of the podophyllotoxin-derivative VP 16-213 (NSC-141540) in L1210 leukemia. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A Pathology. ,vol. 81, pp. 715- 724 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1699-0463.1973.TB03564.X
Marcel Rozencweig, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Jane E. Henney, Franco M. Muggia, VM 26 and VP 16–213: A comparative analysis Cancer. ,vol. 40, pp. 334- 342 ,(1977) , 10.1002/1097-0142(197707)40:1<334::AID-CNCR2820400147>3.0.CO;2-X