Multimodality Computerized Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Using Mammography and Sonography1

作者: Karen Drukker , Karla Horsch , Maryellen L. Giger

DOI: 10.1016/J.ACRA.2005.04.014

关键词:

摘要: Rationale and Objectives The purpose of this study is to investigate the use computer-extracted features lesions imaged by means two modalities, mammography breast ultrasound, in computerized classification lesions. Material Methods We performed analysis on a database 97 patients with total 100 (40 malignant, 40 benign solid, 20 cystic lesions). Mammograms ultrasound images were available for these There was an average three mammographic per lesion. Based seed points indicated radiologist, computer automatically segmented from parenchymal background extracted set characteristic each For feature, its value averaged over all pertaining given lesion input Bayesian neural network classification. also investigated different approaches combine image-based into by-lesion analysis. In that analysis, mean, maximum, minimum feature values considered representing performance using leave-one-lesion-out approach, based image alone (two five features), (three four combination both modalities total). Results task distinguishing cancer other abnormalities lesion-based single modality, areas under receiver operating curves (A z values) increased significantly when selected manner (mean, minimum, or maximum) which combined features. highest found automated selection (resulting being used). That A 0.92, showing statistically significant increase achieved either alone. Conclusion Computerized improved combined. Classification depended specific methods combining multiple These results are encouraging warrant further exploration multimodality imaging.

参考文章(33)
Maryellen Giger, Zhimin Huo, Matthew Kupinski, Carl Vyborny, Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Mammography International Society for Optics and Photonics. pp. 915- 1005 ,(2000) , 10.1117/3.831079.CH15
G Fagerberg, A Gad, S W Duffy, L Tabàr, O Gröntoft, N E Day, Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer Radiologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 30, pp. 187- 210 ,(1992)
Charles E. Metz, Benjamin A. Herman, Cheryl A. Roe, Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets Medical Decision Making. ,vol. 18, pp. 110- 121 ,(1998) , 10.1177/0272989X9801800118
Charles E. Metz, Basic principles of ROC analysis Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 8, pp. 283- 298 ,(1978) , 10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2
Robert A. Smith, Stephen W. Duffy, Rhian Gabe, Laszlo Tabar, Amy M.F. Yen, Tony H.H. Chen, The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 42, pp. 793- 806 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.RCL.2004.06.014
László Tabár, Bedrich Vitak, Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Stephen W. Duffy, Ming-Fang Yen, Ching-Feng Chiang, Ulla Brith Krusemo, Tibor Tot, Robert A. Smith, The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 38, pp. 625- 651 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70191-3
Karla Horsch, Maryellen L Giger, Carl J Vyborny, Luz A Venta, Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography Academic Radiology. ,vol. 11, pp. 272- 280 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00719-0
S Ciatto, M Rosselli Del Turco, P Burke, C Visioli, E Paci, M Zappa, Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 89, pp. 1645- 1649 ,(2003) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6601356
Matthew A. Kupinski, Maryellen L. Giger, Feature selection with limited datasets Medical Physics. ,vol. 26, pp. 2176- 2182 ,(1999) , 10.1118/1.598821
Karen Drukker, Maryellen L. Giger, Karla Horsch, Matthew A. Kupinski, Carl J. Vyborny, Ellen B. Mendelson, Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Medical Physics. ,vol. 29, pp. 1438- 1446 ,(2002) , 10.1118/1.1485995