Membrane Filtration of Effluent from a One-Stage Bioreactor Treating Anaerobic Digester Supernatant

作者: Magdalena Zielińska , Wioleta Mikucka

DOI: 10.1007/S11270-019-4352-1

关键词:

摘要: A challenge in side-stream treatment of anaerobic digester supernatant is that the effluent does not meet discharge standards. To address this challenge, study tested tubular multichannel ceramic microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes for post-treatment supernatant. Pollutant rejection (total suspended solids (TSS), COD, total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (TP)), color removal, membrane susceptibility to fouling were determined at various transmembrane pressures (TMPs) (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 MPa). Both methods completely removed TSS. In MF, COD was with 48–76% efficiency 0.2–0.4 MPa. UF, removal slightly higher, reaching 83.7% 0.4 MPa. With both methods, pollutant did increase TMP 0.5 MPa. MF reduced by 54–100%, irrespective TMP. At 0.2–0.4 MPa, resistance lower permeate flux much higher than UF. 0.5 MPa, differed only from each other. Due larger cut-off, decline slower (0.7 h−1) UF (1.1 h−1), as pore-size favors less foulant deposition. Thus, taking into account efficiency, capacity, washing frequency, cost (pressure), these results indicate 0.4 MPa most effective variant variant, almost colorless contained 25 mg COD/L, no TSS, 55 mg TN/L (75% form nitrites nitrates), 8.5 mg TP/L, thus meeting criteria water be used irrigation or algae cultivation.

参考文章(38)
Seyed M.K. Sadr, Devendra P. Saroj, Membrane technologies for municipal wastewater treatment Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment#R##N#Materials, Processes and Applications. pp. 443- 463 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-1-78242-121-4.00014-9
K. Majewska-Nowak, Fouling of hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes applied to water recovery from dye and surfactant solutions Environment Protection Engineering. ,vol. 31, pp. 229- 240 ,(2005)
Andrew Eaton, A.E. Greenberg, Lenore S. Clesceri, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater Published in <b>1998</b> in Washington DC) by American public health association. ,(1992)
Christian Fux, Marc Boehler, Philipp Huber, Irene Brunner, Hansruedi Siegrist, Biological treatment of ammonium-rich wastewater by partial nitritation and subsequent anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in a pilot plant Journal of Biotechnology. ,vol. 99, pp. 295- 306 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00220-1
In S. Kim, Namjung Jang, The effect of calcium on the membrane biofouling in the membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water Research. ,vol. 40, pp. 2756- 2764 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2006.03.036
Jianquan Luo, Luhui Ding, Benkun Qi, Michel Y. Jaffrin, Yinhua Wan, A two-stage ultrafiltration and nanofiltration process for recycling dairy wastewater Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 102, pp. 7437- 7442 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2011.05.012
SMK Sadr, DP Saroj, S Kouchaki, AA Ilemobade, SK Ouki, None, A group decision-making tool for the application of membrane technologies in different water reuse scenarios Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 156, pp. 97- 108 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2015.02.047
Claudia N. Laabs, Gary L. Amy, Martin Jekel, Understanding the size and character of fouling-causing substances from effluent organic matter (EfOM) in low-pressure membrane filtration. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 40, pp. 4495- 4499 ,(2006) , 10.1021/ES060070R
Shobha Muthukumaran, Duy Anh Nguyen, Kanagaratnam Baskaran, Performance evaluation of different ultrafiltration membranes for the reclamation and reuse of secondary effluent Desalination. ,vol. 279, pp. 383- 389 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.DESAL.2011.06.040