作者: Jens-Christian Svenning , Pil B. M. Pedersen , C. Josh Donlan , Rasmus Ejrnæs , Søren Faurby
关键词:
摘要: In their comment (1) on our review and perspective trophic rewilding science (2), Rubenstein launch a critique not so much directed at study as conservation approach. They first lament that Pleistocene has been scientifically studied since the term was introduced. This is in line with study, where we conclude empirical research rare, fragmented, geographically biased, literature dominated by essays opinion pieces, follow this up providing recommendations for opportunities priorities. then claim … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: svenning{at}bios.au.dk. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1