Latin American Ports: Results and Determinants of Private Sector Participation

作者: Jan Hoffmann

DOI: 10.1057/PALGRAVE.IJME.9100010

关键词:

摘要: The Latin American major ports are no longer inefficient state-run public monopolies. Common user tend to be concessioned under a landlord scheme, whereas specialised and terminals more often privately owned or leased. New infrastructure is still being constructed, regional international private port companies participate in the operations. most renowned successes Panama, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, but not all countries have advanced equally. demand for sector participation depends on desire of promote foreign trade need reduce its fiscal burden. supply by operating appears depend port's hinterland perceived country risk. Perceived corruption, illiteracy, pending broader structural reform seem negative impact both supply. same socio-economic situation that, up now, has acted as an obstacle poorest should considered motivation proceed with necessary reforms future. Privatised operations may help urgently needed general economy, including better education stable institutions – which turn will remaining obstacles privatisation. challenge policy makers initiate this virtuous cycle.

参考文章(7)
Dirk Sommer, Private participation in port facilities : recent trends Research Papers in Economics. pp. 1- 8 ,(1999)
Alejandro Micco, Natalia Pérez, Determinants of Maritime Transport Costs Social Science Research Network. ,(2002) , 10.2139/SSRN.1817241
Gustavo Nombela, Lourdes Trujillo, Privatization and Regulation of the Seaport Industry Social Science Research Network. ,(1999)
Alan S. Harding, Restrictive labor practices in seaports Research Papers in Economics. pp. 1- 47 ,(1990)
Alfred J Baird, Port Privatisation: Objectives, Extent, Process, and the UK Experience International Journal of Maritime Economics. ,vol. 2, pp. 177- 194 ,(2000) , 10.1057/IJME.2000.16
Antonio Estache, Marianela González, Lourdes Trujillo, Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico World Development. ,vol. 30, pp. 545- 560 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00129-2