The Coase Theorem Revisited: Implications for Economic Transition

作者: Tamara Todorova

DOI: 10.1007/S11293-007-9067-9

关键词:

摘要: This paper supports the view expressed by other authors that Ronald Coase’s ideas are often misrepresented in academic world. It restates some of main findings with special emphasis on their relevance to processes taking place Eastern Europe. The goal this is revisit Coasean theory, prove oftentimes it and misinterpreted show its societies experiencing high transaction costs. role legal system under costs stressed importance transitional economies staggeringly tries shed light newly emerging markets respective courts government should play directing economic resources.

参考文章(29)
Walter Block, Private Property Rights, Economic Freedom, and Professor Coase: A Critique of Friedman, McCloskey, Medema, and Zorn Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. ,vol. 26, pp. 923- ,(2003)
Nick James, Highways and byways Sight and Sound. ,vol. 4, pp. 24- 25 ,(1994)
Alan C. Stockman, Introduction to microeconomics Dryden Press. ,(1999)
Richard A Posner, Ronald Coase and Methodology Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 7, pp. 195- 210 ,(1993) , 10.1257/JEP.7.4.195
Thomas H. Tietenberg, Environmental Economics and Policy ,(2000)
Deirdre N. McCloskey, Other Things Equal: The So-Called Coase Theorem Eastern Economic Journal. ,vol. 24, pp. 367- 371 ,(1998)
Ronald H. Coase, The Firm, the Market, and the Law ,(1988)
Matthias Klaes, The History of the Concept of Transaction Costs: Neglected Aspects Journal of The History of Economic Thought. ,vol. 22, pp. 191- 216 ,(2000) , 10.1080/10427710050025411