Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society

作者: Harald Throne-Holst , Eivind Stø

DOI: 10.1080/09537320701726726

关键词:

摘要: This article focuses on one important ethical and political element in the development of nanotechnologies: relevance importance precautionary principle. The principle recommends actions based upon experiences early scientific warnings, even when there is no clear evidence to prove causal links. Our chief contribution discussion about nanotechnologies stakeholder approach a governance perspective. We link our theoretical empirical discussions risk society. In at least two ways society Ulrich Beck seems highly relevant for within Precautionary represent model deal with modern risks; redefined relation between science qualitative interviews four groups stakeholders Norway: (1) non-governmental organizations—consumer, environment, ...

参考文章(25)
Ulrich Beck, Martin Chalmers, Risk Society and the Provident State SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 28- 43 ,(1998) , 10.4135/9781446221983.N2
Søren Holm, John Harris, Precautionary principle stifles discovery Nature. ,vol. 400, pp. 398- 398 ,(1999) , 10.1038/22626
David Gee, Malcolm MacGarvin, Andy Stirling, Jane Keys, Brian Wynne, Sofia Guedes Vaz, Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 European Environment Agency. ,(2001)
Ulrich Beck, Ulrich Beck, World Risk Society ,(1999)
Julia Black, Critical reflections on regulation Research Papers in Economics. ,(2002)
Jane Franklin, Ulrich Beck, The politics of risk society Polity Press. ,(1998)
Gabriel A. Silva, Neuroscience nanotechnology: progress, opportunities and challenges Nature Reviews Neuroscience. ,vol. 7, pp. 65- 74 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NRN1827