Adaptively Addressing Uncertainty in Estuarine and Near Coastal Restoration Projects

作者: Amy B. Borde , John A. Southard , Susan L. Sargeant , Ronald M. Thom , Dana L. Woodruff

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Restoration projects have an uncertain outcome because of a lack information about current site conditions, historical disturbance levels, effects landscape alterations on development, unpredictable trajectories or patterns ecosystem structural and many other factors. A poor understanding the factors that control development dynamics system, such as hydrology, salinity, wave energies, can also lead to unintended outcome. Finally, experience in restoring certain types systems (e.g., rare very fragile habitats) highly modified situations urbanized estuaries) makes project outcomes uncertain. Because these uncertainties, costs rise dramatically attempt come closer goals. All potential sources error be addressed degree through adaptive management. The first step is admitting uncertainties exist, addressing with planning directed research prior implementing project. second evaluate hypothesis-driven experiments during implementation. third use monitoring program adjust needed improve probability reach goal. Themore » fourth final gained future projects. framework includes clear goal statement, conceptual model, evaluation help this restoration process. Projects programs vary their application management restoration, it difficult prescriptive applying necessarily widely scope, goal, characteristics, uncertainties. Very large Mississippi River delta (Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, Act; CWPPRA) incorporated specific detailed elements more active effort. In Puget Sound, Sound Action Team uses site-specific case studies, monitoring, public involvement direct actions reduce microbial contamination harvestable shellfish. Small-scale improved For example, assessments resulted successful seagrasses near ferry terminal Sound. It recommended all conducted framework, where appropriate, approach applied. net effect should less uncertainty, success, advancement science cost savings.« less

参考文章(14)
Frederick T. Short, Edmund P. Green, World Atlas of Seagrasses University of California Press. ,vol. 2003, ,(2003)
Robert G Coles, Catherine A. Short, Frederick T. Short, Global seagrass research methods Elsevier. ,(2001)
Susan L Blanton, Ronald M Thom, Amy B Borde, Heida L Diefenderfer, John A Southard, EVALUATION OF METHODS TO INCREASE LIGHT UNDER FERRY TERMINALS Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). ,(2002) , 10.2172/15001597
Joy B Zedler, None, Handbook for Restoring Tidal Wetlands Handbook for restoring tidal wetlands.. ,(2000) , 10.1201/9781420036619
Ronald M Thom, Adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects Ecological Engineering. ,vol. 15, pp. 365- 372 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00086-0
FT Short, RC Davis, BS Kopp, CA Short, DM Burdick, Site-selection model for optimal transplantation of eelgrass Zostera marina in the northeastern US Marine Ecology Progress Series. ,vol. 227, pp. 253- 267 ,(2002) , 10.3354/MEPS227253
Robert R. Twilley, Victor H. Rivera-Monroy, Ronghua Chen, Leonor Botero, Adapting an Ecological Mangrove Model to Simulate Trajectories in Restoration Ecology Marine Pollution Bulletin. ,vol. 37, pp. 404- 419 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00137-X
Brett R. Dumbauld, David A. Armstrong, Trent L. McDonald, Use of Oyster Shell to Enhance Intertidal Habitat and Mitigate Loss of Dungeness Crab (Cancer magister) Caused by Dredging Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. ,vol. 50, pp. 381- 390 ,(1993) , 10.1139/F93-043
Joy B Zedler, John C Callaway, Evaluating the progress of engineered tidal wetlands Ecological Engineering. ,vol. 15, pp. 211- 225 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00077-X