作者: Elizabeth S. Paul
关键词:
摘要: Animal rights campaigners and scientists working with animals completed anonymous questionnaires in which they were asked to report, not only on their own beliefs ideas about the animal experimentation debate, but also those perceived opposing group hold. Both groups of participants tended have a negative somewhat extreme view other. But did an accurate grasp arguments defenses commonly offered both sides showed some agreement concerning relative capacity different suffer. Differences appeared level phylogenetic hierarchy at thought might be capable suffering, decision-making processes regarding admissibility experiments.