Prognostic Factors in Cutaneous Melanoma

作者: Michael W. Piepkorn , Raymond L. Barnhill

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38385-4_14

关键词:

摘要: As with all malignant tumors, the biological potential of any given primary melanoma is encrypted in genome and epigenetic elements clone(s) cells giving rise to that tumor, expression governed by currently obscure mechanisms stochastic probability. At present, code indecipherable at systems biology level coordinately executes tumor’s behavior within host. Occasional thin, microinvasive melanomas seemingly favorable attributes are sometimes rapidly fatal, thick, bulky exist despite pessimistic expectations remain clinically inert over 5, 10, or more years observation. Because a heterogeneous disease because actual melanocytic tumor thus opaque, one does what human societies have done since time immemorial: searches for physical signs nature. The process resorting such surrogate phenotypic prognostic markers/signs allows categorization which turn generates classification schema enable an understanding which, it hoped, may represent best, albeit rudimentary, approximation neoplastic genotype its potential.

参考文章(276)
Peter J. Bostick, Donald L. Morton, Roderick R. Turner, Kelly T. Huynh, He-Jing Wang, Robert Elashoff, Richard Essner, Dave S.B. Hoon, Prognostic Significance of Occult Metastases Detected by Sentinel Lymphadenectomy and Reverse Transcriptase–Polymerase Chain Reaction in Early-Stage Melanoma Patients Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 17, pp. 3238- 3244 ,(1999) , 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3238
The natural break points for primary-tumor thickness in clinical Stage I melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 305, pp. 1155- 1155 ,(1981) , 10.1056/NEJM198111053051916
K. Horgan, Anurag Srivastava, P. Laidler, R. P. Davies, L. E. Hughes, The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate-thickness (0.76-4.0 mm thick) skin melanoma. A quantitative histologic study. American Journal of Pathology. ,vol. 133, pp. 419- 423 ,(1988)
CALVIN L. DAY, ROBERT A. LEW, MARTIN C. MIHM, ARTHUR J. SOBER, MATTHEW N. HARRIS, THOMAS B. FITZPATRICK, TERENCE J. HARRIST, FREDERICK M. GOLOMB, ALLEN POSTEL, PATRICK HENNESSEY, STEPHEN L. GUMPORT, JOHN W. RAKER, RONALD A. MALT, A. BENEDICT COSIMI, WILLIAM C. WOOD, DANIEL F. ROSES, FRED GORSTEIN, DARRELL RIGEL, ROBERT J. FRIEDMAN, MEDWIN M. MINTZIS, ROBSON W. GRIER, A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for melanoma patients with lesions greater than or equal to 3.65 mm in thickness. The importance of revealing alternative Cox models. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 195, pp. 44- 49 ,(1982) , 10.1097/00000658-198201001-00007
Charles M Balch, W. A. Maddox, A. L. Ingalls, T. M. Murad, S. J. Soong, A multifactorial analysis of melanoma. II. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I (localized) melanoma. Surgery. ,vol. 86, pp. 343- 351 ,(1979)
Morton Dl, Barth A, Wanek La, Prognostic factors in 1,521 melanoma patients with distant metastases. Journal of The American College of Surgeons. ,vol. 181, pp. 193- 201 ,(1995)
John H. Mehnert, Jerome L. Heard, Staging of malignant melanomas by depth of invasion The American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 110, pp. 168- 176 ,(1965) , 10.1016/0002-9610(65)90008-5
Robert J. Friedman, Darrell S. Rigel, Alfred W. Kopf, Caron M. Grin, Edward Heilman, Robert S. Rart, Hideko Kamino, Matthew N. Harris, Daniel F. Roses, Allen H. Postel, Marcia J. Levenstein, Volume of malignant melanoma is superior to thickness as a prognostic indicator. Preliminary observation. Dermatologic Clinics. ,vol. 9, pp. 643- 648 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30368-1