Behavioural Activation for Depression: a systematic review and controlled clinical trial

作者: David Ekers

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Background Depression is a common, disabling condition for which psychological treatments, in particular cognitive behavioural therapies are recommended. Promising results from randomised trials has renewed interest therapy, may be suitable delivery by non-specialist therapists. Aims To deliver phased research programme to examine the clinical and cost effectiveness of therapy depressed adults, suitability intervention non specialists. Research design A systematic review meta-analysis examined treatments depression compared controls or other psychotherapies. Data on symptom level, recovery/dropout rate study level moderators (study quality, number sessions, severity training) were extracted analysed. Based upon controlled trial comparing BA delivered with treatment as usual primary care setting was conducted. Results Meta-Analysis: Seventeen including 1109 subjects included. A post-treatment showed superior (SMD -0.70 CI -1.00 -0.39, k=12, N= 459), brief psychotherapy -0.56 -1.0 to-0.12, k=3, N=166), supportive -0.75 –1.37 -0.14, k=2, N=45) equal 0.08 -0.14 0.30, N=476). Randomised trial: Intention treat analyses indicated difference favour −15.79 (95% −24.55 −7.02) Beck Depression Inventory-II, −11.12; = −17.53 −4.70), Work Social Adjustment Scale 0.20 0.01 0.39) improvement quality adjusted life year. An incremental ratio £5756 per QALY indicates 97% probability that non-specialists more effective than at threshold value £20,000. Conclusion Behavioural Activation an appears non-specialists. Further larger sample sizes longer follow up required expand findings reported this thesis.

参考文章(199)
Carolyn Chew-Graham, Robert Baldwin, Alistair Burns, Treating depression in later life BMJ. ,vol. 329, pp. 181- 182 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.329.7459.181
Richard J. Light, David B. Pillemer, Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research ,(1984)
Anthony L. Johnson, Clinical trials in psychiatry. Psychological Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 8 ,(1983) , 10.1017/S0033291700049990
Richard Layard, The case for psychological treatment centres BMJ. ,vol. 332, pp. 1030- 1032 ,(2006) , 10.1136/BMJ.332.7548.1030
Peter M. Lewinsohn, Michael Graf, Pleasant activities and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 41, pp. 261- 268 ,(1973) , 10.1037/H0035142
D. L Sackett, J. E Wennberg, CHOOSING THE BEST RESEARCH DESIGN FOR EACH QUESTION BMJ. ,vol. 315, pp. 1636- 1636 ,(1997) , 10.1136/BMJ.315.7123.1636
Nina Buscemi, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, Terry P. Klassen, Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 59, pp. 697- 703 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.11.010
Peter Jüni, Anne Witschi, Ralph Bloch, Matthias Egger, The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. ,vol. 282, pp. 1054- 1060 ,(1999) , 10.1001/JAMA.282.11.1054
Peter D. McLean, A. Ralph Hakstian, Clinical depression: comparative efficacy of outpatient treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 47, pp. 818- 836 ,(1979) , 10.1037/0022-006X.47.5.818