Self-report measures: an overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research
作者： Tiffani Razavi , None
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: As is the case with many domains of organisational behaviour, occupational stress research has for many years been characterised by the use of self-report methodologies, in particular …
参考文章(59)
Michael T. Brannick, Paul E. Spector, The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology West Sussex, England: John Wiley. ,vol. 10, pp. 249- ,(1995)
George S. Howard, Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,vol. 15, pp. 399- 404 ,(1994) , 10.1002/JOB.4030150505
Katharine R. Parkes, Coping, negative affectivity, and the work environment: Additive and interactive predictors of mental health. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 75, pp. 399- 409 ,(1990) , 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.399
Robert Hogan, Robert A. Nicholson, The meaning of personality test scores. American Psychologist. ,vol. 43, pp. 621- 626 ,(1988) , 10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.621
Michael D Newcomb, G.J Huba, P.M Bentler, Desirability of various life change events among adolescents: Effects of exposure, sex, age, and ethnicity. Journal of Research in Personality. ,vol. 20, pp. 207- 227 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0092-6566(86)90118-2
B. W. Stening, J. E. Everett, Response Styles in a Cross-Cultural Managerial Study Journal of Social Psychology. ,vol. 122, pp. 151- 156 ,(1984) , 10.1080/00224545.1984.9713475
ROSEDITH SITGREAVES, Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). Psyccritiques. ,vol. 24, ,(1979) , 10.1037/018882
Neal Schmitt, Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,vol. 15, pp. 393- 398 ,(1994) , 10.1002/JOB.4030150504
David L. Hamilton, Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 69, pp. 192- 203 ,(1968) , 10.1037/H0025606
Robert A. Nicholson, Robert Hogan, The construct validity of social desirability. American Psychologist. ,vol. 45, pp. 290- 292 ,(1990) , 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.290