Legal Innovations to the Strasbourg Court and the Decision Qama versus Albania

摘要: Strasbourg Court in the past three years has undergone some important changes relating to its internal functioning. Precisely aim of this article is reflect these innovations give a better understanding organization on issues. We have mention here as first legal innovation court judicial disputes according urgency application, and when request based articles 2,3,4,5 par. 1 ECHR. Also part paper will be next pilot judgment his positive consequences, functioning court. Part our analysis final decision against Albania Mr. Qama January 8, 2013, which represents for us, but we think also readers, special interest terms issues raised trial case. The question is: To ehat extent are recognized foreign decisions country, by Albanian state courts, at time there was another outside same issue, facts, subject? very aspect interpretation notion state's obligation take steps protect privacy citizens. After analyzing it stated that seeks achieve high level professional justification decision, with main disadvantage large number applications faces. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n6p365