Unreliable informant testimony.

作者: Jeffrey S Neuschatz , Nicholaos Jones , Stacy A Wetmore , Joy McClung , Jeffrey Neuschatz

DOI: 10.1037/13085-010

关键词:

摘要:

参考文章(39)
Spencer Martinez, Bargaining for Testimony: Bias of Witnesses Who Testify in Exchange for Leniency The Cleveland State Law Review. ,vol. 47, pp. 141- ,(1999)
C. Blaine Elliott, Life's Uncertainties:How to Deal with Cooperating Witnessesand Jailhouse Snitches Capital Defense Journal. ,vol. 16, pp. 1- ,(2003)
Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Are Twelve Heads Better than One? Law and Contemporary Problems. ,vol. 52, pp. 205- 224 ,(1989) , 10.2307/1191911
Lee Ross, The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 10, pp. 173- 220 ,(1977) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
Lynda Olsen-Fulero, Solomon M. Fulero, Commonsense rape judgments: An empathy–complexity theory of rape juror story making. Psychology, Public Policy and Law. ,vol. 3, pp. 402- 427 ,(1997) , 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.402
Regina A. Schuller, Patricia A. Hastings, Trials of battered women who kill: the impact of alternative forms of expert evidence Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 20, pp. 167- 187 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF01499353
Nancy Pennington, Reid Hastie, Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 62, pp. 189- 206 ,(1992) , 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
James H. Davis, Norbert L. Kerr, Garold Stasser, David Meek, Robert Holt, Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. ,vol. 18, pp. 346- 365 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0030-5073(77)90035-6