A Rejoinder on the PSW Model for SLD Identification: Still Concerned

作者: Ryan J. McGill , R. T. Busse

DOI: 10.1007/S40688-017-0124-3

关键词:

摘要: We address Christo, D’Incau, and Ponzuric’s response to our original contribution this journal “When theory trumps science: A critique of the PSW model for SLD identification.” Christo colleagues stated that there is an empirical support pattern strengths weaknesses (PSW) procedures as a component in identification specific learning disorders raised concerns regarding model. present further research perspective maintain data are lacking assessment disability (SLD). School psychologists cautioned consider evidence practice PSW-related procedures.

参考文章(33)
Kristin M. H. Peterson, Mark R. Shinn, Severe Discrepancy Models: Which Best Explains School Identification Practices for Learning Disabilities? School Psychology Review. ,vol. 31, pp. 459- 476 ,(2002) , 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086168
Stefan C. Dombrowski, Don Ambrose, Amanda Clinton, Dogmatic Insularity in Learning Disabilities Classification and the Critical Need for a Philosophical Analysis. International journal of special education. ,vol. 22, pp. 3- 10 ,(2007)
J. Hale, V. Alfonso, V. Berninger, B. Bracken, C. Christo, E. Clark, M. Cohen, A. Davis, S. Decker, M. Denckla, R. Dumont, C. Elliott, S. Feifer, C. Fiorello, D. Flanagan, E. Fletcher-Janzen, D. Geary, M. Gerber, M. Gerner, S. Goldstein, N. Gregg, R. Hagin, L. Jaffe, A. Kaufman, N. Kaufman, T. Keith, F. Kline, C. Kochhar-Bryant, J. Lerner, G. Marshall, J. Mascolo, N. Mather, M. Mazzocco, G. McCloskey, K. McGrew, D. Miller, J. Miller, M. Mostert, J. Naglieri, S. Ortiz, L. Phelps, B. Podhajski, L. Reddy, C. Reynolds, C. Riccio, F. Schrank, E. Schultz, M. Semrud-Clikeman, S. Shaywitz, J. Simon, L. Silver, L. Swanson, A. Urso, T. Wasserman, J. Willis, D. Wodrich, P. Wright, J. Yalof, Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus Learning Disability Quarterly. ,vol. 33, pp. 223- 236 ,(2010) , 10.1177/073194871003300310
Karla K. Stuebing, Jack M. Fletcher, Lee Branum-Martin, David J. Francis, Amanda VanDerHeyden, Evaluation of the Technical Adequacy of Three Methods for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities Based on Cognitive Discrepancies. School Psychology Review. ,vol. 41, pp. 3- 22 ,(2012) , 10.1080/02796015.2012.12087373
Marley W. Watkins, Cognitive profile analysis: A shared professional myth. School Psychology Quarterly. ,vol. 15, pp. 465- 479 ,(2000) , 10.1037/H0088802
Stefan C. Dombrowski, Randy W. Kamphaus, Melissa Barry, Amber Brueggeman, Sarah Cavanagh, Katie Devine, Linda Hekimoglu, Sarah Vess, The Solomon effect in learning disabilities diagnosis: Can we learn from history? School Psychology Quarterly. ,vol. 21, pp. 359- 374 ,(2006) , 10.1037/H0084128
Scott O. Lilienfeld, Rachel Ammirati, Michal David, Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error Journal of School Psychology. ,vol. 50, pp. 7- 36 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JSP.2011.09.006
Stefan C. Dombrowski, Karen L. Gischlar, Ethical and Empirical Considerations in the Identification of Learning Disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 68- 82 ,(2014) , 10.1080/15377903.2013.869786
Jeremy Miciak, W. Pat Taylor, Carolyn A. Denton, Jack M. Fletcher, The effect of achievement test selection on identification of learning disabilities within a patterns of strengths and weaknesses framework. School Psychology Quarterly. ,vol. 30, pp. 321- 334 ,(2015) , 10.1037/SPQ0000091