Economic growth and sustainable development: how should we discount the future?

作者: Qinglong Zhou , Ivar Ekeland , Yiming Long

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: In 1987, the Brundtland Commission famously defined sustainable development as “development that meets needs of present without compromising future”. This paper is concerned with translating this definition in framework neoclassical one-sector model economic growth. We investigate and compare three possible criteria for development. The first one, which was introduced by Chichilnisky, second Ekeland Lazrak, third goes back to Ramsey himself. define equilibrium strategies. For Chichilnisky criterion, there a unique strategy, just optimal strategy model. other two cases, continuum conclude most satisfying candidates are strategies criterion (H-criterion)

参考文章(6)
Chuan-Zhong Li, Karl-Gustaf Löfgren, Renewable Resources and Economic Sustainability: A Dynamic Analysis with Heterogeneous Time Preferences Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 40, pp. 236- 250 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEEM.1999.1121
Philippe Aghion, Patrick Bolton, A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 64, pp. 151- 172 ,(1997) , 10.2307/2971707
R. H. Strotz, Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 23, pp. 165- 180 ,(1955) , 10.2307/2295722
Andrew Caplin, John Leahy, The recursive approach to time inconsistency Journal of Economic Theory. ,vol. 131, pp. 134- 156 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JET.2005.05.006
Larry Karp, Non-Constant Discounting in Continuous Time Journal of Economic Theory. ,vol. 132, pp. 557- 568 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JET.2005.07.006