A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR GENERATING THE PARETO OPTIMAL SET

作者: M. BALACHANDRAN , J. S. GERO

DOI: 10.1080/03052158408960646

关键词:

摘要: This paper describes and compares three approaches to solving design optimization problems with multiple conflicting objectives. The techniques are described in detail then applied lo an example which demonstrates how information is accumulated leads a logical efficient multicriteria optimal design. employed (weighting, noninferior set estimation constraint methods) ate compared each other by considering their computational efficiencies abilities produce approximation of the Pareto set.

参考文章(5)
M. A. ROSENMAN, J. S. GERO, PARETO OPTIMAL SERIAL DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING Engineering Optimization. ,vol. 6, pp. 177- 183 ,(1983) , 10.1080/03052158308902467
M. BALACHANDRAN, J. S. GERO, THE NONINFERIOR SET ESTIMATION (NISE) METHOD FOR THREE OBJECTIVE PROBLEMS Engineering Optimization. ,vol. 9, pp. 77- 88 ,(1985) , 10.1080/03052158508902504
W J Mitchell, J P Steadman, Robin S Liggett, Synthesis and Optimization of Small Rectangular Floor Plans Environment and Planning B-planning & Design. ,vol. 3, pp. 37- 70 ,(1976) , 10.1068/B030037
J S Gero, Note on “Synthesis and Optimization of Small Rectangular Floor Plans” of Mitchell, Steadman, and Liggett¶: Environment and Planning B-planning & Design. ,vol. 4, pp. 81- 88 ,(1977) , 10.1068/B040081