Women’s views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study
作者： J Frost , A Shaw , A Montgomery , DJ Murphy
DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2009.02120.X
关键词:
摘要: Objective To obtain the views of women on their experiences decision making about method delivery following a previous caesarean section and role aids in this process. Design Qualitative study nested within randomised controlled trial, using repeat semi-structured interviews conducted pre- postnatally. Data were analysed framework approach. Setting Three maternity units south-west England Scotland. Sample Purposive sample 30 participating trial two for mode next (Decision Aids Mode Delivery). Results Thirty interviewed during pregnancy experience 22 re-interviewed Key themes were: reducing decisional conflict uncertainty pregnancy; impact knowledge anxiety; relationship between prior preferences, decisions actual outcome; mediating aids. Conclusions Women value some form structured information to help reduce conflict. Information provision needs be relevant individual needs. Decision analysis may reconcile preferences delivery.
bristol.ac.uk
sci-hub.se 参考文章(20)
Alan A Montgomery, , The DiAMOND trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section [ISRCTN84367722] BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. ,vol. 4, pp. 25- 25 ,(2004) , 10.1186/1471-2393-4-25
Deb Feldman-Stewart, Sarah Brennenstuhl, Kathryn McIssac, Joan Austoker, Agathe Charvet, Paul Hewitson, Karen R. Sepucha, Tim Whelan, A systematic review of information in decision aids Health Expectations. ,vol. 10, pp. 46- 61 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2006.00420.X
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn‐Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, None, Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 4, pp. 0- 0 ,(2017) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.PUB5
Allison Shorten, Brett Shorten, John Keogh, Sandra West, Jonathan Morris, Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth-issues in Perinatal Care. ,vol. 32, pp. 252- 261 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.0730-7659.2005.00383.X
Glyn Elwyn, Adrian Edwards, Martin Eccles, David Rovner, Decision analysis in patient care. The Lancet. ,vol. 358, pp. 571- 574 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05709-9
Ruth Walker, Deborah Turnbull, Nicole Pratt, Chris Wilkinson, The development and process evaluation of an information-based intervention for pregnant women aimed at addressing rates of caesarean section British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 112, pp. 1605- 1614 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00753.X
Jeanne-Marie Guise, Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. BMJ. ,vol. 329, pp. 359- 360 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.329.7462.359
Clare L. Emmett, Deirdre J. Murphy, Roshni R. Patel, Tom Fahey, Claire Jones, Ian W. Ricketts, Peter Gregor, Maureen Macleod, Alan A. Montgomery, , Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expectations. ,vol. 10, pp. 161- 172 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2006.00429.X
MA Moffat, JS Bell, MA Porter, S Lawton, V Hundley, P Danielian, S Bhattacharya, Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section : a qualitative study British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 114, pp. 86- 93 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2006.01154.X