Land‐cover data improve bioclimatic models for anurans and turtles at a regional scale

作者: R. Tingley , T. B. Herman

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2009.02117.X

关键词:

摘要: Aim  We investigated whether accounting for land cover could improve bioclimatic models eight species of anurans and three turtles at a regional scale. then tested spatial autocorrelation significantly after statistically controlling the effects cover. Location  Nova Scotia, eastern Canada. Methods  Species distribution data were taken from recent (1999–2003) herpetofaunal atlas. Generalized linear used to relate presence or absence each climate land-cover variables 10-km resolution. accounted using an autocovariate third-order trend surface geographical coordinates grid square. Finally, variance partitioning was explore independent joint contributions climate, autocorrelation. Results  The inclusion increased explanatory power 10 11 species. Furthermore, including predictive performance Accounting improved model fit rare but generally did not prediction success. Variance demonstrated that this lack improvement result high correlation between trend-surface variables. Main conclusions  results study suggest can argue integration is likely produce more accurate predictions contemporary diversity. However, use simulations in climate-induced range-shift projections introduces additional uncertainty into models. Further research therefore needed determine merited.

参考文章(71)
Nicolas Ray, Anthony Lehmann, Pierre Joly, Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 11, pp. 2143- 2165 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1021390527698
Stéphanie Manel, H. Ceri Williams, S.J. Ormerod, Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 38, pp. 921- 931 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.1365-2664.2001.00647.X
JANA M. McPHERSON, WALTER JETZ, DAVID J. ROGERS, The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 41, pp. 811- 823 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0021-8901.2004.00943.X
Pedro Segurado, Miguel B. Araújo, An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 31, pp. 1555- 1568 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2004.01076.X
Arndt Hampe, Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 13, pp. 469- 471 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1466-822X.2004.00090.X
L. A. Venier, J. Pearce, J. E. McKee, D. W. McKenney, G. J. Niemi, Climate and satellite-derived land cover for predicting breeding bird distribution in the Great Lakes Basin Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 31, pp. 315- 331 ,(2004) , 10.1046/J.0305-0270.2003.01014.X
Benjamin L Phillips, Joseph D Chipperfield, Michael R Kearney, None, The toad ahead: challenges of modelling the range and spread of an invasive species Wildlife Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 222- 234 ,(2008) , 10.1071/WR07101