Collimator Selection for SPECT Brain Imaging: The Advantage of High Resolution

作者: M.F. Kijewski , B.L. Holman , S.P. Mueller , J.F. Polak

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: We compared a prototype long-bore (LB) high-resolution collimator with low-energy, general-purpose (LEGP) using 99mTc and 123I. The LB provided 56% improvement in tomographic resolution (autocorrelation width) over the LEGP for 99mTc; 123I, gain was 79%, providing substantially improved contrast small structures. sensitivity of collimator, however, is only 32% that LEGP. imaging tasks to be performed on [123I]IMP brain scans involve localization discrimination small, high-contrast structures detection abnormalities shape, size, or uptake, rather than simple lesions. Observer performance such higher-order known depend high spatial resolution, even at cost sensitivity. Patient studies confirmed that, resolution-limited tasks, increase outweighs increased noise due loss When degraded by smoothing LEGP, images lower factor 2.9 same time, demonstrating advantage detectors smooth reconstruction filter low-resolution without smoothing. Therefore, collimators designed substantial sensitivity, are expected yield significant improvements SPECT. Geometric calculations show commercially available cast promise meet these requirements.

参考文章(11)
Ronald E. McKeighen, Gerd Muehllehner, Robert A. Moyer, Gamma camera collimator considerations for imaging 123I. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 15, pp. 328- 331 ,(1974)
Anders Israelsson, Peter Msaki, Bertil Axelsson, Subtraction of Compton-Scattered Photons in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 490- 494 ,(1984)
English Rj, Holman Bl, Polak Jf, Performance of collimators used for tomographic imaging of I-123 contaminated with I-124. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 1065- 1069 ,(1983)
John C. Mazziotta, Michael E. Phelps, David Plummer, David E. Kuhl, Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 5. Physical--anatomical effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 5, pp. 734- 743 ,(1981) , 10.1097/00004728-198110000-00029
Kenneth M. Hanson, Variations In Task And The Ideal Observer Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. ,vol. 0419, pp. 60- 67 ,(1983) , 10.1117/12.936006
L. A. Shepp, B. F. Logan, The Fourier reconstruction of a head section IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. ,vol. 21, pp. 21- 43 ,(1974) , 10.1109/TNS.1974.6499235
Edward J. Hoffman, Sung-Cheng Huang, Michael E. Phelps, Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 3, pp. 299- 308 ,(1979) , 10.1097/00004728-197906000-00001
B. LEONARD HOLMAN, THOMAS C. HILL, PHILIPPE L. MAGISTRETTI, Brain imaging with emission computed tomography and radiolabeled amines. Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 17, pp. 206- 215 ,(1982) , 10.1097/00004424-198201730-00002
Robert F. Wagner, David G. Brown, Mary S. Pastel, Application of information theory to the assessment of computed tomography Medical Physics. ,vol. 6, pp. 83- 94 ,(1979) , 10.1118/1.594559