Re-framing the urban blight problem with trans-disciplinary insights from ecological economics

作者: R.C. Weaver

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2013.03.009

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Similar to circumstances in the field of economics, market fundamentalism dominates urban blight policy spaces U.S. despite criticisms paradigm. Unlike unified alternative that ecological economics (EE) provides conventional economic theory, however, disagreement over meaning “blight” has prevented a commonly held pre-analytic vision and agenda from forming critical scholarship. This paper asserts “applied EE” offers framework which develop such vision, strengthen inchoate stream. We draw on EE theory concepts argue can be understood as stock accumulates an system result underinvestment into real property. Our conceptualization problem several important implications for public policy. A brief illustration compares relative efficacy one city's characteristically neoliberal policies with more “EE-consistent” second city show latter might fact outperform former.

参考文章(39)
Herman E. Daly, Joshua C. Farley, Ecological Economics: Principles And Applications ,(2003)
Colin Gordon, Blighting the Way: Urban Renewal, Economic Development, and the Elusive Definition of Blight Fordham Urban Law Journal. ,vol. 31, pp. 305- ,(2004)
Jon C. Teaford, Urban Renewal and Its Aftermath Housing Policy Debate. ,vol. 11, pp. 443- 465 ,(2000) , 10.1080/10511482.2000.9521373
William Grigsby, Morton Baratz, George Galster, Duncan Maclennan, The dynamic of neighborhood change and decline Progress in Planning. ,vol. 28, pp. 1- ,(1987) , 10.1016/0305-9006(87)90011-0
Erik Swyngedouw, Frank Moulaert, Arantxa Rodriguez, Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy Antipode. ,vol. 34, pp. 542- 577 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1467-8330.00254