The outcomes of pregnancies after laparoscopic surgeries for pathologic changes on distal oviduct: A systematic review and meta-analysis

作者: Hongjing Han , Yuan Zhang , Xiaoming Yu , Xingbang Zheng , Antoine Watrelot

DOI: 10.1016/J.GOCM.2020.11.003

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to summarize the body of evidence on prognosis after laparoscopic surgeries for pathological conditions distal oviducts, then, furthermore, evaluate prognostic factors pregnancy outcomes. Methods We conducted a this topic, with question formulated as “what is fimbrioplasty, salpingostomy, or salpingoneostomy patients pathologic oviducts.” searched Medline EMBASE June 1st, 2020. Two investigators (HH ZY) independently screened references all retrieved records potentially eligible studies by firstly, through titles abstract, then full-text. A study would be included if it was primary reporting outcomes laparascopic surgery. rates pregnancy, ectopic live birth, miscarriage performed using random effect model. Results identified 3861 21 reports 2473 participants. The pooled estimate rate 35.1% (95% CI: 30.7%–39.7%, I2 ​= ​78%, low certainty). estimates birth rate, 24.4% 20.2%–28.8%, I2 ​= ​58%; 1154 participants; certainty), 6.2% 4.4%–8.2%, I2 ​= ​61%; 2363 4.6% 2.8%–6.9%, I2 ​= ​10%; 544 Our analyses suggested that more damaged tubal associated decreased moderate severe adhesion had lower compared mild pelvic adhesion. Conclusion estimated pathology fimbrioplasty salpingostomy. Low certainty surgery can restore function cure infertility should considered an alternative in vitro fertilization. Tubal damage stage are worse

参考文章(17)
Trudy C.M. Trimbos-Kemper, J. Baptist Trimbos, Eylard V. van Hall, Adhesion formation after tubal surgery: results of the eighth-day laparoscopy in 188 patients. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 43, pp. 395- 400 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48438-4
Gerard Mage, Jean-Luc Pouly, Jean Bouquet de Jolinière, Sylvie Chabrand, Alain Riouallon, Maurice-Antoine Bruhat, A preoperative classification to predict the intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates after distal tubal microsurgery Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 46, pp. 807- 810 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49815-8
Stelios Michalas, Spiros Milingos, Anthi Liapi, Alexander Elsheikh, George Kallipolitis, Athanasios Protopapas, Dimitrios Loutradis, Spiros Miaris, Dimitrios Milingos, Hydrosalpinx Treatment: Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. ,vol. 18, pp. 49- 58 ,(2002) , 10.1089/104240602760172873
Sung-Tack Oh, Tubal patency and conception rates with three methods of laparoscopic terminal neosalpingostomy Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 3, pp. 519- 523 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80161-6
A. Iorio, F. A. Spencer, M. Falavigna, C. Alba, E. Lang, B. Burnand, T. McGinn, J. Hayden, K. Williams, B. Shea, R. Wolff, T. Kujpers, P. Perel, P. O. Vandvik, P. Glasziou, H. Schunemann, G. Guyatt, Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ. ,vol. 350, ,(2015) , 10.1136/BMJ.H870
Rebecca C Taylor, Jonathan Berkowitz, Peter F McComb, Role of laparoscopic salpingostomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinx. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 75, pp. 594- 600 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01737-4
Victor Gomel, The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive techniques. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. ,vol. 31, pp. 722- 731 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RBMO.2015.09.010
Amir Lass, What is the preferred treatment for hydrosalpines? The ovary's perspective Human Reproduction. ,vol. 14, pp. 1674- 1677 ,(1999) , 10.1093/HUMREP/14.7.1674
Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 36, pp. 1- 48 ,(2010) , 10.18637/JSS.V036.I03