A comparison of hedonic and emotional responses to common odors delivered by qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices) and traditional sniff jars
作者： Jessica M. Gaby , Beverly J. Tepper
DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2019.103804
关键词:
摘要: Abstract qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices, Curion) are novel olfactory delivery systems which allow for sampling of a wide variety stimulus types. Participants evaluate odors by opening port at the top qPOD and controlled air stream. Though they often used in marketing studies, their potential use empirical research has yet to be investigated. We asked participants smell citral, citronellol, geraniol, PEA, nonalactone, vanillin delivered via traditional sniff jars, compared both hedonic emotional responses. Across four sessions, 31 evaluated pleasantness intensity each odor jars. Their reactions were captured with PANAS (Positive And Negative Affect Schedule) beginning testing session, then again after exposure odor. They also completed newly developed Mood Signature Questionnaire, asks assign mood odor, rather than reporting how it makes them feel. presented jars rated significantly more intense (p
sci-hub.se 参考文章(43)
S MARCHAND, P ARSENAULT, Odors modulate pain perception: a gender-specific effect. Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 76, pp. 251- 256 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00703-5
S. Craig Roberts, Jan Havlíček, Marion Petrie, Repeatability of odour preferences across time Flavour and Fragrance Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 245- 250 ,(2013) , 10.1002/FFJ.3142
Jay A. Gottfried, Ralf Deichmann, Joel S. Winston, Raymond J. Dolan, Functional Heterogeneity in Human Olfactory Cortex: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 22, pp. 10819- 10828 ,(2002) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-24-10819.2002
Lavi Secundo, Kobi Snitz, Kineret Weissler, Liron Pinchover, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Ron Loewenthal, Nancy Agmon-Levin, Idan Frumin, Dana Bar-Zvi, Sagit Shushan, Noam Sobel, Individual olfactory perception reveals meaningful nonolfactory genetic information Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 112, pp. 8750- 8755 ,(2015) , 10.1073/PNAS.1424826112
Howard R. Moskowitz, Andrew Dravnieks, Leon A. Klarman, Odor intensity and pleasantness for a diverse set of odorants Perception & Psychophysics. ,vol. 19, pp. 122- 128 ,(1976) , 10.3758/BF03204218
Andreas Keller, Margaret Hempstead, Iran A Gomez, Avery N Gilbert, Leslie B Vosshall, An olfactory demography of a diverse metropolitan population BMC Neuroscience. ,vol. 13, pp. 122- 122 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1471-2202-13-122
M. Bensafi, C. Rouby, V. Farget, B. Bertrand, M. Vigouroux, A. Holley, Psychophysiological correlates of affects in human olfaction. Neurophysiologie Clinique-clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 32, pp. 326- 332 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0987-7053(02)00339-8
Johan N. Lundström, Amy R. Gordon, Eva C. Alden, Sanne Boesveldt, Jessica Albrecht, Methods for building an inexpensive computer-controlled olfactometer for temporally-precise experiments International Journal of Psychophysiology. ,vol. 78, pp. 179- 189 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2010.07.007
Thomas J. Wudarski, Richard L. Doty, Comparison of detection threshold values determined using glass sniff bottles and plastic squeeze bottles. Perceptual and Motor Skills. ,vol. 98, pp. 192- 196 ,(2004) , 10.2466/PMS.98.1.192-196
RenéD. Balogh, Richard H. Porter, Olfactory preferences resulting from mere exposure in human neonates Infant Behavior & Development. ,vol. 9, pp. 395- 401 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0163-6383(86)90013-5