The effect of different methods of collecting data: Mail, telephone and filter data collection issues in utility measurement

作者: Graeme Hawthorne

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026103511161

关键词:

摘要: When collecting data researchers can interview participants, conduct telephone interviews, or mailout questionnaires. Often mixed methods are used. Whether these produce equivalent is under-researched in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) field. In addition, effect using filter questions has not been researched among HRQoL multi-attribute utility instruments. This study randomly sampled from Melbourne, Australia, and employed a test–retest design to investigate whether mail made any difference Assessment Quality Life (AQoL) instrument scores. A question AQoL version investigated filters on There was no significant standard scores between self-completion interview, regardless which administered first. Inclusion encouraged respondents select best response category thereby screening out minor health conditions. The increase by 0.06 7%. previously reported instruments profound implications for economic evaluations cost-utility analysis; there general. conclusion, should feel confident that elicited through administrations directly comparable.

参考文章(38)
Graeme Hawthorne, Jeff Richardson, Richard Osborne, The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 209- 224 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008815005736
Richard Osborne, G Hawthorne, Y Wegmueller, M Papanicolaou, Measurement of rapid changes in health outcomes in people with influenza symptoms. Journal of drug assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 205- 220 ,(2000)
Richard Osbourne, Graeme Hawthorne, Helen McNeil, Jeff Richardson, The Australian Multi-attribute Utility (AMAU) construction and Initial Evaluation ,(1996)
Penelope Hawe, Deirdre Degeling, Jane Hall, Evaluating health promotion : a health worker's guide MacLennan + Petty. ,(1990)
Response Effects of the Mode of Data Collection John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 501- 552 ,(2005) , 10.1002/0471725277.CH11
Joop J. Hox, Edith D. De Leeuw, A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys Quality and Quantity. ,vol. 28, pp. 329- 344 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF01097014
AW Wu, DL Jacobson, RA Berzon, DA Revicki, C Van Der Horst, CJ Fichtenbaum, MS Saag, L Lynn, D Hardy, J Feinberg, The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 3- 10 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1026471020698
C J Wiltraut, Y J Musselman, J N Burdine, A L Abel, M R Felix, The SF-12 as a population health measure: an exploratory examination of potential for application. Health Services Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 885- 904 ,(2000)
Deborah L. Greiner, Samuell N. Addy, Sumatriptan use in a large group-model health maintenance organization. American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy. ,vol. 53, pp. 633- 638 ,(1996) , 10.1093/AJHP/53.6.633
Gerald Hoinville, Roger Jowell, Survey research practice ,(1977)