Feasibility of cetuximab and chemoradiotherapy combination in Chinese patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report.

作者: Di Liu , Jia-Yan Chen , Guo-Liang Jiang , Yu-Xin Shen , Wei-Xin Zhao

DOI: 10.3978/J.ISSN.1000-9604.2014.11.05

关键词:

摘要: Objective: In recent years, the combination of cetuximab and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been used to treat stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, limited data are available for Chinese patients. Herein, we report preliminary from a phase I/II study testing with inductive chemotherapy, followed by concurrent CRT (CCRT) in patients NSCLC. Methods: Eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) 0-1, forced expiratory volume 1 second (FEV1) ≥1.2 L adequate organ function. Enrolled received weekly (initial dose 400 mg/m 2 on day week maintenance 250 end CCRT) cisplatin/vinorelbine (NP) chemotherapy (every 3 weeks cycles 2, two concomitant NP intensity-modulated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) (60-66 Gy/2 Gy). The primary endpoints toxicity feasibility. All positron emission tomographycomputerized tomography (PET-CT) scans within prior enrollment. Univariate analyses assess correlation between SUV-T, SUV-N, SUV-TOTAL, gender, age, histology, tumor-nodemetastasis (TNM) stage, PS smoking survival. Survival curves generated different populations using Kaplan-Meier method compared log-rank test. Results: Seventeen enrolled 16 completed full regime. overall response rate (ORR) was 58.8% 82.3% after induction CCRT phases, respectively. With median follow-up duration 27.6 months, survival months [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.3-43.9 months] 1- 2-year rates 88.2% (95% CI, 60.6-96.9%) 60.6-77.8%), Three remain progression-free date, (PFS) 13.5 6.8-20.2 months). No treatment-related death occurred; 76% experienced grade 3+ adverse events (AEs), including nausea/vomiting, intestinal obstruction, esophagitis (<6%), while other AEs mostly hematological nature (71%). cut-off values SUV-T SUV-TOTAL 11 20, revealed (P=0.027), (P=0.025), (P=0.006) as potential predictors, hazard ratio (HR) 3.4, 3.7, 9.9, Conclusions: appears feasible promising. Local locoregional maximal SUVs, defined 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning, may represent prognostic indicator long-term these patients, which warrants further study.

参考文章(28)
Alexandra D. Jensen, Marc W. Münter, Helge G. Bischoff, Renate Haselmann, Uwe Haberkorn, Peter E. Huber, Michael Thomas, Jürgen Debus, Klaus K. Herfarth, Combined treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC stage III with intensity‐modulated RT radiotherapy and cetuximab Cancer. ,vol. 117, pp. 2986- 2994 ,(2011) , 10.1002/CNCR.25888
Johan F. Vansteenkiste, Sigrid G. Stroobants, Patrick J. Dupont, Paul R. De Leyn, Erik K. Verbeken, Georges J. Deneffe, Luc A. Mortelmans, Maurits G. Demedts, Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 17, pp. 3201- 3206 ,(1999) , 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3201
S.D.J.M. Kanters, J-W.J. Lammers, E.E. Voest, Molecular and biological factors in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. European Respiratory Journal. ,vol. 8, pp. 1389- 1397 ,(1995) , 10.1183/09031936.95.08081389
Ikenna C. Okereke, Sidhu P. Gangadharan, Michael S. Kent, Saila P. Nicotera, Changyu Shen, Malcolm M. DeCamp, Standard Uptake Value Predicts Survival in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. ,vol. 88, pp. 911- 916 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2009.05.083
Thierry Berghmans, Michèle Dusart, Marianne Paesmans, Claude Hossein-Foucher, Irene Buvat, Catherine Castaigne, Arnaud Scherpereel, Céline Mascaux, Michel Moreau, Martine Roelandts, Stéphane Alard, Anne-Pascale Meert, Edward F. Patz, Jean-Jacques Lafitte, Jean-Paul Sculier, Primary Tumor Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) Measured on Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) is of Prognostic Value for Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project Journal of Thoracic Oncology. ,vol. 3, pp. 6- 12 ,(2008) , 10.1097/JTO.0B013E31815E6D6B
E.A. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, J. Bogaerts, L.H. Schwartz, D. Sargent, R. Ford, J. Dancey, S. Arbuck, S. Gwyther, M. Mooney, L. Rubinstein, L. Shankar, L. Dodd, R. Kaplan, D. Lacombe, J. Verweij, New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 45, pp. 228- 247 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.10.026
Corey J. Langer, Heather Wakelee, Joan Schiller, Hak Choy, Frances Shepherd, Everett E. Vokes, Alex A. Adjei, Paul Baas, Nagahiro Saijo, David R. Gandara, Cooperative group portfolio in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: are we making progress? Clinical Lung Cancer. ,vol. 9, pp. 85- 91 ,(2008) , 10.3816/CLC.2008.N.013
Mariano Provencio, Beata Utracka-Hutka, Eugenio Villa, Manuel Codes, Abraham Kuten, Michael Henke, Massimo Lopez, David Bell, Giampaolo Biti, Ofer Merimsky, Aulo Beorchia, Marcello Riggi, Noël-Raphaël Caux, Jean-Christophe Pouget, Bernard Dubray, Philippe David, Maciej Krzakowski, Oral Vinorelbine and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy and Concomitant Chemo-Radiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Final Results of an International Phase II Trial Journal of Thoracic Oncology. ,vol. 3, pp. 994- 1002 ,(2008) , 10.1097/JTO.0B013E31818396CB
Sachiko Nasu, K.Kian Ang, Zhen Fan, Luka Milas, C225 antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody enhances tumor radiocurability. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 51, pp. 474- 477 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01671-6
Everett E. Vokes, James E. Herndon, Jeffrey Crawford, Kenneth A. Leopold, Michael C. Perry, Antonius A. Miller, Mark R. Green, Randomized Phase II Study of Cisplatin With Gemcitabine or Paclitaxel or Vinorelbine as Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IIIB Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9431 Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 20, pp. 4191- 4198 ,(2002) , 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.054