A checklist of attributes for effective monitoring of threatened species and threatened ecosystems.

作者: David Lindenmayer , John Woinarski , Sarah Legge , Darren Southwell , Tyrone Lavery

DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.110312

关键词:

摘要: Monitoring of threatened species and ecosystems is critical for determining population trends, identifying urgency management responses, assessing the efficacy interventions. Yet many are not monitored those that are, quality monitoring often poor. Here we provide a checklist factors need to be considered inclusion in robust programs ecosystems. These can grouped under four broad themes - design programs, structure governance data reporting, appropriate funding legislative support. We briefly discuss key attributes our these themes. Key topics first theme include objective setting, identification most entities measured, consistency methodology protocols through time, ensuring long-term, embedding into management. Under second which focuses on ecosystems, touch importance adopting that: test effectiveness interventions, produce results relevant management, engage with (and accepted by) community. Theme 3, why highlight costs curation, analysis reporting factored budgets programs. This requires levels made available beyond just cost collection topic examined 4. examples, from Australia, each recognize closely inter-related therefore conceptual model highlighting linkages. suggest help identify parts existing adequate purpose or may deficient improved.

参考文章(70)
Rachel M. Santymire, Travis M. Livieri, Heather Branvold-Faber, Paul E. Marinari, The black-footed ferret: on the brink of recovery? Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 753, pp. 119- 134 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2_7
David B Lindenmayer, Gene E Likens, Effective Ecological Monitoring ,(2010)
Kota Ullas Karanth, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, Narayanarao Samba Kumar, Srinivas Vaidyanathan, James D. Nichols, Darryl I. MacKenzie, Monitoring carnivore populations at the landscape scale: occupancy modelling of tigers from sign surveys Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 1048- 1056 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.02002.X
Emma L. Burns, David B. Lindenmayer, John Stein, Wade Blanchard, Lachlan McBurney, David Blair, Sam C. Banks, Ecosystem assessment of mountain ash forest in the Central Highlands of Victoria, south‐eastern Australia Austral Ecology. ,vol. 40, pp. 386- 399 ,(2015) , 10.1111/AEC.12200
John Cz Woinarski, Peter Lynton Harrison, Andrew A Burbidge, The Action Plan for Australian Mammals 2012 ,(2014)
VICTORIA A. SHEEAN, ADRIAN D. MANNING, DAVID B. LINDENMAYER, An assessment of scientific approaches towards species relocations in Australia Austral Ecology. ,vol. 37, pp. 204- 215 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1442-9993.2011.02264.X
Georgia E. Garrard, Sarah A. Bekessy, Michael A. McCarthy, Brendan A. Wintle, Incorporating detectability of threatened species into environmental impact assessment Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 216- 225 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12351
Brendan A. Wintle, Michael C. Runge, Sarah A. Bekessy, Allocating monitoring effort in the face of unknown unknowns Ecology Letters. ,vol. 13, pp. 1325- 1337 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2010.01514.X
Mick N. Clout, Graeme P. Elliott, Bruce C. Robertson, Effects of supplementary feeding on the offspring sex ratio of kakapo: a dilemma for the conservation of a polygynous parrot Biological Conservation. ,vol. 107, pp. 13- 18 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00267-1
Euan Nisbet, Cinderella science Nature. ,vol. 450, pp. 789- 790 ,(2007) , 10.1038/450789A