Forestland connectivity in Romania—Implications for policy and management

作者: Petru Tudor Stăncioiu , Mihai Daniel Niță , Gabriel Ervin Lazăr

DOI: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2018.02.028

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Forest policies and management rules imposed on forests in Romania provide favourable habitat conditions for many species across forest landscapes. This is empirically proven by the high biodiversity of Carpathians their surroundings. However, they do not explicitly address spatial arrangement patches Therefore, assessment connectivity (inside tracts continuous – i.e. intrapatch also among spatially separate interpatch connectivity) important. To analyze this, CORINE Land Cover data set (2012) available was used. were classified into three size categories considered to ensure survival tree populations short term, medium long term: Interconnectivity Nodes (IN: 1,5 14,9 ha, minimum 30 m width), Habitat Islands (HI: 15,0 ha 499,0 ha, 100 m width) Continuum (HC: over 500 ha with a 200 m respectively. The each patch others around it assessed maximum threshold distance 1 km. Further terms its strength (depending category which connected) quality (size structure resulting connected cluster). Next, distributions main various sizes, vegetation assessed. results showed good between patches, both (85% area included HC class) (92,4% are 12 clusters 10.000 ha; these one comprised 86,7% total area). general, higher mountainous areas than at lower elevations (area patches: 97,5% Norway spruce vs. 63,3% pedunculate oak; strong connection 97,8% 67,2% 98,2% 68,6% oak). These confirm that guidelines inherited from past general. enforcement practices future should conservation forested landscapes national scale routes migration context climate change. as large proportion forestland today state-owned, financial incentives private owners key condition further acceptance major goals met.

参考文章(39)
Martin Mikoláš, Marek Svitok, Martin Tejkal, Pedro J. Leitão, Robert C. Morrissey, Miroslav Svoboda, Meelis Seedre, Joseph B. Fontaine, Evaluating forest management intensity on an umbrella species: Capercaillie persistence in central Europe Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 354, pp. 26- 34 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.07.001
Chadwick Dearing Oliver, Bruce A Larson, Forest stand dynamics: updated edition. Forest stand dynamics: updated edition.. ,(1996)
Ioan Vasile ABRUDAN, Viorel MARINESCU, Ovidiu IONESCU, Florin IORAS, Sergiu Andrei HORODNIC, Radu E. SESTRAS, Developments in the Romanian forestry and its linkages with other sectors Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-napoca. ,vol. 37, pp. 14- 21 ,(2009) , 10.15835/NBHA3723468
San-Miguel-Ayanz Jesus, Caudullo Giovanni, Estreguil Christine, Connectivity of Natura 2000 forest sites Publications Office of the European Union. ,(2013) , 10.2788/95065
Stephen C. Trombulak, Clinton W. Epps, Adina M. Merenlender, Paul Beier, Leah R. Gerber, Deborah A. Rudnick, Jeff S. Jenness, Sadie J. Ryan, Joel Hartter, Ryan M. Perkl, Damian V. Preziosi, Julia Kintsch, Samuel A. Cushman, Fred Dieffenbach, The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities Issues in Ecology. 16(Fall): 1-20.. pp. 1- 23 ,(2012)
David B. Lindenmayer, Jerry F. Franklin, Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach ,(2002)
Joern Fischer, David B. Lindenmayer, Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 16, pp. 265- 280 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2007.00287.X