Derived Relational Responding as an Operant: The Effects of Between-Session Feedback

作者: Olive Healy , Dermot Barnes , Paul M. Smeets

DOI: 10.1007/BF03395286

关键词:

摘要: Relational Frame Theory (RFT) views derived relational responding as an overarching operant class of behavior. One approach to the analysis relations from RFT perspective, therefore, would be examine systematically effects differential consequences on responding. In Experiment 1, 15 undergraduate subjects were divided into three conditions (5 in each condition). condition exposed 11 sessions, and session they trained tested for formation combinatorially entailed relations. Condition no delivered after any session. 2, responseindependent, positive feedback was first five sessions (i.e., experimenter said subject “You are doing very well”) response-independent, negative Sessions 6 10 badly”). 3 similar except that followed by remaining feedback. The results showed (a) delivering before attenuated relative condition, (b) produced more frequent nofeedback condition. 2 replicated Conditions replaced accurate inaccurate feedback, respectively. During told “You’re well” if above 50% correct badly” less than correct. This reversed automatically via computer. 4 involved a control whereby test phase unrelated baseline training. remained identical previous experiment. 5 3, but precise that, following phase, received point every response made. general, highly sensitive response-contingent this when used. Overall, data consistent with suggestion may viewed generalized

参考文章(15)
Dermot Barnes, Peter John Hampson, Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. Psychological Record. ,vol. 43, pp. 617- 638 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF03395903
Dermot Barnes, Michael Keenan, A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 59, pp. 61- 81 ,(1993) , 10.1901/JEAB.1993.59-61
David Steele, Steven C. Hayes, Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 56, pp. 519- 555 ,(1991) , 10.1901/JEAB.1991.56-519
Dermot Barnes, Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 65, pp. 264- 267 ,(1996) , 10.1901/JEAB.1996.65-264
Regina Lipkens, Steven C. Hayes, Linda J. Hayes, Longitudinal Study of the Development of Derived Relations in an Infant Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. ,vol. 56, pp. 201- 239 ,(1993) , 10.1006/JECP.1993.1032
Carol Pilgrim, Mark Galizio, Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 54, pp. 213- 224 ,(1990) , 10.1901/JEAB.1990.54-213
Bryan Roche, Dermot Barnes, A TRANSFORMATION OF RESPONDENTLY CONDITIONED STIMULUS FUNCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARBITRARILY APPLICABLE RELATIONS Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 67, pp. 275- 301 ,(1997) , 10.1901/JEAB.1997.67-275
Joseph E. Spradlin, Kathryn J. Saunders, Richard R. Saunders, Dean C. Williams, UNREINFORCED CONDITIONAL SELECTION WITHIN THREE-CHOICE CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATIONS Psychological Record. ,vol. 45, pp. 613- 627 ,(1995)
Dermot Barnes, Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory Psychological Record. ,vol. 44, pp. 91- 124 ,(1994)