Assessing the Evolution of Sustainability Reporting in the Mining Sector

作者: Fabiana Perez , Luis E. Sanchez

DOI: 10.1007/S00267-008-9269-1

关键词:

摘要: Since the 1990s several large companies have been publishing nonfinancial performance reports. Focusing initially on physical environment, these reports evolved to consider social relations, as well data firm’s economic performance. A few mining pioneered this trend, and in last years some of them incorporated three dimensions sustainable development, so-called sustainability This article reviews 31 published between 2001 2006 by four major companies. set 62 assessment items organized six categories (namely context commitment, management, environmental, performance, accessibility assurance) were selected guide review. The derived from international literature recommended best practices, including Global Reporting Initiative G3 framework. content analysis was performed using report a sampling unit, phrases, graphics, or tables containing certain information collection units. basic rating scale (0 1) used for noting presence absence final percentage score obtained each report. Results show that there is clear evolution report’s comprehensiveness depth. Categories “accessibility assurance” “economic performance” featured lowest scores do not present trend period, whereas “context commitment” “social presented results regular improvement; category “environmental performance,” despite it reaching biggest scores, also constant evolution. Description measurement techniques, besides more comprehensive third-party verification are most need improvement.

参考文章(33)
J Larson, R Harrach, P Althouse, N Bertoldo, A Biermann, R Blake, E Brandstetter, S Brigdon, R Brown, E Christofferson, K Folkes, G Gallegos, L Garcia, T Giesing, A Grayson, L Hall, H MacQueen, S Mathews, S Peterson, M Taffet, P Tate, R Vellinger, R Ward, Environmental Report 1998 Other Information: PBD: 22 Sep 1999. ,(1999) , 10.2172/756934
Gro Harlem Brundtland, Our common future Earth and Us#R##N#Population–Resources–Environment–Development. pp. 29- 31 ,(1987) , 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5
Lee D. Parker, Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 18, pp. 842- 860 ,(2005) , 10.1108/09513570510627739
Rob Gray, Reza Kouhy, Simon Lavers, Corporate social and environmental reporting Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 8, pp. 47- 77 ,(1995) , 10.1108/09513579510146996
Craig Deegan, Michaela Rankin, John Tobin, An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 15, pp. 312- 343 ,(2002) , 10.1108/09513570210435861
Gifford Pinchot, Breaking new ground ,(1972)
Carol Ann Tilt, None, The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate SocialDisclosure: Some Empirical Evidence Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 7, pp. 47- 72 ,(1994) , 10.1108/09513579410069849
Philip Peck, Knud Sinding, Environmental self-reporting Mining environmental management; 9(6), pp 10-14 (2001). ,vol. 9, pp. 10- 14 ,(2001)
John E. Young, Ed Ayres, Mining the earth ,(1992)
Heledd Jenkins, Natalia Yakovleva, Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 14, pp. 271- 284 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2004.10.004