SOME DIFFERENCES IN THE ACTION OF PENICILLIN, BACITRACIN, AND VANCOMYCIN ON BACILLUS MEGATERIUM

作者: R. Hancock , P. C. Fitz-James

DOI: 10.1128/JB.87.5.1044-1050.1964

关键词:

摘要: Hancock, R. (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.), and P. C. Fitz-James. Some differences in the action of penicillin, bacitracin, vancomycin on Bacillus megaterium. J. Bacteriol. 87:1044-1050. 1964.-Penicillin cycloserine do not inhibit growth protoplasts megaterium, indicating that inhibition cell-wall synthesis is only significant process by which they bacteria. In contrast, bacitracin bacteria at similar concentrations, have important sites other than their known synthesis. At concentrations mucopeptide synthesis, each cause an increased rate efflux K ions from growing This effect penicillin prevented chloramphenicol or hypertonic sucrose, whereas effects are unchanged under these conditions. It concluded direct cytoplasmic membrane, it proposed could be a consequence effects. Bacitracin compete with for binding to cells B. further indication different primary site action.

参考文章(12)
Louise S. Prestidge, Arthur B. Pardee, INDUCTION OF BACTERIAL LYSIS BY PENICILLIN1 Journal of Bacteriology. ,vol. 74, pp. 48- 59 ,(1957) , 10.1128/JB.74.1.48-59.1957
Gerald D. Shockman, J. Oliver Lampen, INHIBITION BY ANTIBIOTICS OF THE GROWTH OF BACTERIAL AND YEAST PROTOPLASTS Journal of Bacteriology. ,vol. 84, pp. 508- 512 ,(1962) , 10.1128/JB.84.3.508-512.1962
Bernard D. Davis, Elizabeth S. Mingioli, MUTANTS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI REQUIRING METHIONINE OR VITAMIN B12 Journal of Bacteriology. ,vol. 60, pp. 17- 28 ,(1950) , 10.1128/JB.60.1.17-28.1950
P. D. Cooper, SITE OF ACTION OF RADIOPENICILLIN Bacteriological Reviews. ,vol. 20, pp. 28- 48 ,(1956) , 10.1128/BR.20.1.28-48.1956
Philip C. Fitz-James, Cytological and Chemical Studies of the Growth of Protoplasts of Bacillus megaterium Journal of Cell Biology. ,vol. 4, pp. 257- 266 ,(1958) , 10.1083/JCB.4.3.257
Donald T. Dubin, Bernard D. Davis, The effect of streptomycin on potassium flux in Escherichia coli Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. ,vol. 52, pp. 400- 402 ,(1961) , 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90697-7