Intra- and extra-axonal axial diffusivities in the white matter: which one is faster?

作者: Ileana O. Jelescu , Nicolas Kunz , Analina R. da Silva

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: A two-compartment model of diffusion in white matter, which accounts for intra- and extra-axonal spaces, is associated with two plausible mathematical scenarios: either the intra-axonal axial diffusivity higher than (Branch 1), or opposite 2). This duality calls an independent validation compartment diffusivities, to determine cases holds. The aim present study was use intracerebroventricular injection a gadolinium-based contrast agent selectively reduce extracellular water signal rat brain, compare metrics genu corpus callosum before after gadolinium infusion. considered were kurtosis tensor metrics, as well compartment-specific estimates WMTI-Watson model. strong decrease T1 T2 relaxation times post-Gd observed (p < 0.001), increase 48% radial 0.05), implies that relative fraction decreased. further supported by significant estimated from model, both branches 0.01 Branch 1, p 0.05 However, pre-Gd axon dispersion 1 agreed better literature those 2. Furthermore, comparison changes between data simulations biologically solution, i.e. one. result fully consistent other recent measurements diffusivities used entirely different approaches, such encoding.

参考文章(42)
Uran Ferizi, Torben Schneider, Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Hui Zhang, Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott, Daniel C. Alexander, A ranking of diffusion MRI compartment models with in vivo human brain data Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 1785- 1792 ,(2014) , 10.1002/MRM.25080
Lawrence H. Bannister, Peter L. Williams, Henry Gray, Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery ,(1996)
Marco Palombo, Silvia Gentili, Marco Bozzali, Emiliano Macaluso, Silvia Capuani, New insight into the contrast in diffusional kurtosis images: does it depend on magnetic susceptibility? Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 73, pp. 2015- 2024 ,(2015) , 10.1002/MRM.25308
Rolf Gruetter, Automatic, localized in vivo adjustment of all first- and second-order shim coils. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 29, pp. 804- 811 ,(1993) , 10.1002/MRM.1910290613
Jianhui Zhong, Richard P Kennan, John C Gore, Effects of susceptibility variations on NMR measurements of diffusion Journal of Magnetic Resonance. ,vol. 95, pp. 267- 280 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0022-2364(91)90217-H
Rolf Gruetter, Ivan Tk�?, Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo-planar techniques. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 43, pp. 319- 323 ,(2000) , 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200002)43:2<319::AID-MRM22>3.0.CO;2-1
Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Torben Schneider, Bernard Siow, Matt G. Hall, Mark F. Lythgoe, Daniel C. Alexander, Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: a taxonomy and comparison. NeuroImage. ,vol. 59, pp. 2241- 2254 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.081
Sune N. Jespersen, Christopher D. Kroenke, Leif Østergaard, Joseph J.H. Ackerman, Dmitriy A. Yablonskiy, Modeling dendrite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements. NeuroImage. ,vol. 34, pp. 1473- 1486 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2006.10.037
P.J. Basser, J. Mattiello, D. Lebihan, Estimation of the Effective Self-Diffusion Tensor from the NMR Spin Echo Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B. ,vol. 103, pp. 247- 254 ,(1994) , 10.1006/JMRB.1994.1037
Hui Zhang, Torben Schneider, Claudia A. Wheeler-Kingshott, Daniel C. Alexander, NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain NeuroImage. ,vol. 61, pp. 1000- 1016 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.03.072