Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism, and why it matters

作者: Valerie Tiberius , Alicia Hall

DOI: 10.1080/17439761003790971

关键词:

摘要: This article is a contribution to the debate about eudaimonism started by Kashdan et al. and Waterman in previous issue of The Journal Positive Psychology [Kashdan, T.B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L.A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: costs distinguishing between hedonics eudaimonia. Psychology, 3(4), 219–233; Waterman, A.S. A eudaimonist's perspective. 234–252]. We point out that one thing missing from this an understanding problems with subjective theories well-being motivate turn objective theories. better rationale for helps us see what needed theory well-being. then argue suitably modified can provide ought be favored psychologists.

参考文章(33)
Walter Reese-Schäfer, Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books 1974 Schlüsselwerke der Politikwissenschaft. pp. 334- 338 ,(2007) , 10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_89
Valerie Tiberius, Full information and ideal deliberation Journal of Value Inquiry. ,vol. 31, pp. 329- 338 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1004295329083
Ed Diener, Christie Napa Scollon, Richard E. Lucas, The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology. ,vol. 15, pp. 67- 100 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4
L. W. Sumner, Welfare, happiness, and ethics ,(1996)
David Owen Brink, None, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics ,(1989)
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia ,(1974)
Corey L. M. Keyes, Julia Annas, Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science The Journal of Positive Psychology. ,vol. 4, pp. 197- 201 ,(2009) , 10.1080/17439760902844228