“No Free Lunch” Theorems Applied to the Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models

作者: Biagio Ciuffo , Vincenzo Punzo

DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2287720

关键词:

摘要: In 1997, Wolpert and Macready derived “No free lunch theorems for optimization.” They basically state that “the expected performance of any pair optimization algorithms across all possible problems is identical.” This to say there no algorithm outperforms the others over entire domain problems. other words, choice most appropriate depends upon specific problem under investigation, a certain algorithm, while providing good (both in terms solution quality convergence speed) on problems, may reveal weak others. apparently straightforward concept not always acknowledged by practitioners. A typical example, field traffic simulation, concerns calibration models. this paper, general method verifying robustness procedure (suitable, general, simulation optimization) proposed based test with synthetic data. The main obstacle methodology significant computation time required necessary simulations. For reason, Kriging approximation model instead. tested case study, where effect different combinations parameters, algorithms, measures goodness fit, levels noise data also investigated. Results show clear dependence between study analysis ascertain need global solutions

参考文章(33)
Vincenzo Punzo, Biagio Filippo Ciuffo, Sensitivity Analysis of Car-following Models: Methodology and Application Transportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. ,(2011)
Vincenzo Punzo, Biagio Filippo Ciuffo, Verification of Traffic Micro-simulation Model Calibration Procedures: Analysis of Goodness-of-Fit Measures Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. ,(2010)
Zsolt Ugray, Leon Lasdon, John C. Plummer, Fred Glover, Jim Kelly, Rafael Martí, A Multistart Scatter Search Heuristic for Smooth NLP and MINLP Problems Operations Research/ Computer Science Interfaces Series. ,vol. 30, pp. 25- 57 ,(2005) , 10.1007/0-387-23667-8_2
Donald R. Jones, Matthias Schonlau, William J. Welch, Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions Journal of Global Optimization. ,vol. 13, pp. 455- 492 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008306431147
D. Huang, T. T. Allen, W. I. Notz, R. A. Miller, Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. ,vol. 32, pp. 369- 382 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00158-005-0587-0
John L. Maryak, Daniel C. Chin, Global Random Optimization by Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. ,vol. 53, pp. 780- 783 ,(2008) , 10.1109/TAC.2008.917738
Ramachandran Balakrishna, Constantinos Antoniou, Moshe Ben-Akiva, Haris N. Koutsopoulos, Yang Wen, Calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models: Methods and application Transportation Research Record. ,vol. 1999, pp. 198- 207 ,(2007) , 10.3141/1999-21
Yaron Hollander, Ronghui Liu, The principles of calibrating traffic microsimulation models Transportation. ,vol. 35, pp. 347- 362 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11116-007-9156-2
J. Kiefer, J. Wolfowitz, Stochastic Estimation of the Maximum of a Regression Function Annals of Mathematical Statistics. ,vol. 23, pp. 462- 466 ,(1952) , 10.1214/AOMS/1177729392
Arne Stolbjerg Drud, CONOPT—A Large-Scale GRG Code Informs Journal on Computing. ,vol. 6, pp. 207- 216 ,(1994) , 10.1287/IJOC.6.2.207