Naftopidil for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic hyperplasia

作者: Eu Chang Hwang , Shreyas Gandhi , Jae Hung Jung , Mari Imamura , Myung Ha Kim

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007360.PUB3

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Treatment aims are to relieve and prevent disease-related complications. Naftopidil an alpha-blocker (AB) has high affinity for the A1d receptor have advantages treating LUTS this setting. This update of Cochrane Review first published 2009. Since time, several large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) been reported, making relevant. OBJECTIVES To evaluate effects naftopidil treatment associated with BPH. SEARCH METHODS We performed comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, LILAC, Web Science), registries, other sources grey literature, conference proceedings no restrictions on language publication or status up 31 May 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA: included all parallel RCTs. also cross-over design trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently classified abstracted data from studies. statistical analyses random-effects model interpreted them according Handbook Systematic Reviews Interventions. Primary outcomes were urological symptom scores, quality life (QoL) withdrawals any reason; secondary due adverse events, acute retention, surgical intervention BPH, cardiovascular sexual events. considered measured 12 months after randomisation as short term, later than long term. rated certainty evidence GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS 22 RCTs 2223 participants across four comparisons short-term follow-up. abstract focuses only two which we found since comparators (i.e. propiverine Eviprostat (phytotherapy)) rarely used. One study comparing placebo did not report relevant was therefore excluded. There compared combination therapy 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) ABs 5-ARIs.All studies conducted Asian countries. Study duration ranged weeks. Mean age 67.8 years, prostate volume 35.4 mL, International Prostate Symptom Score 18.3. unable perform preplanned subgroup based baseline score.Naftopidil versus tamsulosinBased 965 participants, resulted little difference score (mean (MD) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 1.04 scale 0 35 higher representing increased symptoms), QoL (MD 0.11, CI 0.30; 6 scores worse QoL), reason (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 0.64 1.34; corresponding 7 fewer per 1000 32 more). events (RR 0.54, 0.24 1.22); would result 26 (95% 43 13 moderate low outcomes.Naftopidil silodosinBased five 652 1.04, -0.78 2.85), 0.21, -0.23 0.66), 0.80, 0.52 1.23; 62 these outcomes. likely reduced 0.15, 0.06 0.42; 126 139 86 fewer). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS appears similar tamsulosin silodosin. but

参考文章(80)
Satoru Takahashi, Kenya Yamaguchi, Sakura Clinical Study Group, Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and aging: Impacts of alpha-1 blockers on sexual function Journal of Men's Health. ,vol. 8, ,(2011) , 10.1016/S1875-6867(11)60015-8
Debra A Schwinn, Claus G Roehrborn, α1‐Adrenoceptor subtypes and lower urinary tract symptoms International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 15, pp. 193- 199 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2007.01956.X
Michael A. Kozminski, John T. Wei, Jason Nelson, David M. Kent, Baseline characteristics predict risk of progression and response to combined medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJUI. ,vol. 115, pp. 308- 318 ,(2015) , 10.1111/BJU.12802
Kenya Yamaguchi, Yutaka Aoki, Tetsuo Yoshikawa, Takahiko Hachiya, Tadanori Saito, Satoru Takahashi, Silodosin versus naftopidil for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter randomized trial. International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 20, pp. 1234- 1238 ,(2013) , 10.1111/IJU.12160
OSAMU MARUYAMA, YOSHIO KAWACHI, KISABURO HANAZAWA, KAZUO KOIZUMI, RYO YAMASHITA, SOSUKE SUGIMURA, SHIN-ICHI HONDA, YOSHIKI SUGIYAMA, TOSHIHIKO SAITOH, KENSHO NOTO, Naftopidil monotherapy vs naftopidil and an anticholinergic agent combined therapy for storage symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective randomized controlled study. International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 13, pp. 1280- 1285 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2006.01538.X
Teruhiko Yokoyama, Ryoei Hara, Kazuhiko Fukumoto, Tomohiro Fujii, Yoshimasa Jo, Yoshiyuki Miyaji, Atsushi Nagai, Atsushi Sone, Effects of three types of alpha-1 adrenoceptor blocker on lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual function in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 18, pp. 225- 230 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2010.02708.X
Roman Jaeschke, Joel Singer, Gordon H. Guyatt, Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 10, pp. 407- 415 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
TERUHIKO YOKOYAMA, HIROMI KUMON, YOSHITSUGU NASU, HITOSHI TAKAMOTO, TOYOHIKO WATANABE, Comparison of 25 and 75 mg/day naftopidil for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective, randomized controlled study International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 13, pp. 932- 938 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2006.01443.X
Toshiro Shirakawa, Takahiro Haraguchi, Katsumi Shigemura, Shinichi Morishita, Kohji Minayoshi, Jiro Miyazaki, Yuji Yamada, Hideaki Miyake, Kazushi Tanaka, Masato Fujisawa, Silodosin versus naftopidil in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized multicenter study International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 20, pp. 903- 910 ,(2013) , 10.1111/IJU.12055
Osamu Ukimura, Motohiro Kanazawa, Atsuko Fujihara, Kazumi Kamoi, Koji Okihara, Tsuneharu Miki, , Naftopidil versus tamsulosin hydrochloride for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia with special reference to the storage symptom: A prospective randomized controlled study International Journal of Urology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1049- 1054 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1442-2042.2008.02169.X