A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning

作者: EMILY S. MINOR , DEAN L. URBAN

DOI: 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2007.00871.X

关键词:

摘要: Connectivity of habitat patches is thought to be important for movement genes, individuals, populations, and species over multiple temporal spatial scales. We used graph theory characterize aspects landscape connectivity in a network the North Carolina Piedmont (U.S.A). compared this with simulated networks known topology, resistance disturbance, rate movement. introduced measures such as compartmentalization clustering, which can identify locations on that may especially resilient human development or areas most suitable conservation. Our analyses indicated songbirds was well connected. Furthermore, had commonalities planar networks, exhibit slow movement, scale-free are resistant random disturbances. These results suggest high enough prevent negative consequences isolation but not so allow rapid spread disease. graph-theory framework provided insight into regional emergent global properties an intuitive visual way allowed us make inferences about rates paths movements vulnerability disturbance. This approach applied easily assessing any fragmented patchy landscape.

参考文章(50)
Garry D. Peterson, Estimating Resilience Across Landscapes Conservation Ecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 17- ,(2002) , 10.5751/ES-00375-060117
Glenn D. Sutherland, Alton S. Harestad, Karen Price, Ken Lertzman, Scaling of Natal Dispersal Distances in Terrestrial Birds and Mammals Conservation Ecology. ,vol. 4, ,(2000) , 10.5751/ES-00184-040116
Timothy Keitt, Dean L. Urban, Bruce T. Milne, Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes Conservation Ecology. ,vol. 1, pp. 4- ,(1997) , 10.5751/ES-00015-010104
Paul Opdam, Jana Verboom, Rogier Pouwels, Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity Landscape Ecology. ,vol. 18, pp. 113- 126 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1024429715253
Ilkka Hanski, Otso Ovaskainen, The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape Nature. ,vol. 404, pp. 755- 758 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35008063
Rachael Winfree, Jonathan Dushoff, Elizabeth E. Crone, Cheryl B. Schultz, Robert V. Budny, Neal M. Williams, Claire Kremen, Testing simple indices of habitat proximity. The American Naturalist. ,vol. 165, pp. 707- 717 ,(2005) , 10.1086/430009
Lutz Tischendorf, Lenore Fahrig, On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply Oikos. ,vol. 95, pp. 152- 155 ,(2001) , 10.1034/J.1600-0706.2001.950117.X
A.G Bunn, D.L Urban, T.H Keitt, Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 59, pp. 265- 278 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEMA.2000.0373
Justin M. Calabrese, William F. Fagan, A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 2, pp. 529- 536 ,(2004) , 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2
Réka Albert, Albert-László Barabási, Eric Bonabeau, Scale-Free Networks Scientific American. ,vol. 288, pp. 60- 69 ,(2003) , 10.1038/SCIENTIFICAMERICAN0503-60