Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study

作者: James Ansell , Neil Warren , Pete Wall , Kim Cocks , Stuart Goddard

DOI: 10.1007/S00464-014-3427-8

关键词:

摘要: Background Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers of procedure where smoke present. All assessors also used 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent 5 very annoying/bad) rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes number smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), 89.2 (83.3–95.0) for active cases 71.2 (65.7–76.7) controls. proportion present 41.1 (33.8–48.3) 61.5 (49.0–74.1) Operating rated impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) 3.2 (2.8–3.5) Reviewers 2.3 (2.0–2.5) (2.8–3.7) group, 23 procedures paused allow clearance compared 94 cases. Camera cleaning not needed in 85 35 reduced 0 88 Conclusions improves surgery reduces delays cleaning.

参考文章(14)
Yu-Wen Lin, Shou-Zen Fan, Kuo-Hui Chang, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Chin-Sheng Tang, A Novel Inspection Protocol to Detect Volatile Compounds in Breast Surgery Electrocautery Smoke Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. ,vol. 109, pp. 511- 516 ,(2010) , 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60085-X
John Spearman, George Tsavellas, Paul Nichols, Current Attitudes and Practices Towards Diathermy Smoke Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 89, pp. 162- 165 ,(2007) , 10.1308/003588407X155752
Ralph Hollmann, Christian E. Hort, Erich Kammer, Markus Naegele, Markus W. Sigrist, Claudia Meuli-Simmen, Smoke in the operating theater: an unregarded source of danger. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 114, pp. 458- 463 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.PRS.0000131886.72932.C3
Douglas Ott, Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 26, pp. 322- 330 ,(2008) , 10.1055/S-0028-1082390
S. H. Pillinger, L. Delbridge, D. R. Lewis, Randomized clinical trial of suction versus standard clearance of the diathermy plume. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 90, pp. 1068- 1071 ,(2003) , 10.1002/BJS.4214
Peter J. Capizzi, Ricky P. Clay, Mary Jo Battey, Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. ,vol. 23, pp. 172- 174 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1998)23:3<172::AID-LSM7>3.0.CO;2-M
William S. Sawchuk, Paul J. Weber, Douglas R. Lowy, Leonard M. Dzubow, Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: Detection and protection Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 21, pp. 41- 49 ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0190-9622(89)70146-8
J. S. Wu, D. R. Luttmann, T. A. Meininger, N. J. Soper, Production and systemic absorption of toxic byproducts of tissue combustion during laparoscopic surgery Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 11, pp. 1075- 1079 ,(1997) , 10.1007/S004649900533
John E. Gatti, Charles J. Bryant, R. Barrett Noone, J. Brien Murphy, The Mutagenicity of Electrocautery Smoke Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 89, pp. 781- 784 ,(1992) , 10.1097/00006534-199205000-00001
Andrew R. Moot, Katherine M. Ledingham, Paul F. Wilson, Senti T. Senthilmohan, David R. Lewis, Justin Roake, Randall Allardyce, COMPOSITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN DIATHERMY PLUME AS DETECTED BY SELECTED ION FLOW TUBE MASS SPECTROMETRY ANZ Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 77, pp. 20- 23 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.2006.03827.X