Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: moving beyond the agonistic – communicative divide

作者: Sophie Bond

DOI: 10.1177/1473095210383081

关键词:

摘要: Theories of urban democracy that are relevant, critical and take sufficient account the pervasiveness power continue to pose challenges. Two theoretical frameworks dominate in relation planning – Habermasian-inspired communicative theory Mouffe’s agonistic pluralism. Both frames typically held be incommensurable because fundamental ontological epistemological differences debate between proponents each tends polemic. theories have complementary strengths weaknesses terms insights they capable providing. Moreover, realities governance situations often display characteristics can explained both framings. This article negotiates a path beyond polemic debate. It problematizes way forward for co-opts principles one into framework assumes position ...

参考文章(43)
Patsy Healey, Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society Town Planning Review. ,vol. 69, pp. 1- ,(1998) , 10.3828/TPR.69.1.H651U2327M86326P
Yannis Stavrakakis, Aletta J. Norval, David R. Howarth, Discourse Theory and Political Analysis Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change Manchester University Press , Distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin's Press. ,(2000)
E R Alexander, A Mile or a Millimeter? Measuring the ‘Planning Theory — Practice Gap’ Environment and Planning B-planning & Design. ,vol. 24, pp. 3- 6 ,(2016) , 10.1068/B240003
Bish Sanyal, Globalization, Ethical Compromise and Planning Theory: Planning Theory. ,vol. 1, pp. 116- 123 ,(2002) , 10.1177/147309520200100202
Margo Huxley, The Limits to Communicative Planning Journal of Planning Education and Research. ,vol. 19, pp. 369- 377 ,(2000) , 10.1177/0739456X0001900406
Jeremy Valentine, The hegemony of hegemony History of the Human Sciences. ,vol. 14, pp. 88- 104 ,(2001) , 10.1177/095269510101400105
Andrew Schaap, Agonism in divided societies Philosophy & Social Criticism. ,vol. 32, pp. 255- 277 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0191453706061095
S Davoudi, P Healey, City Challenge: Sustainable Process or Temporary Gesture?: Environment and Planning C-government and Policy. ,vol. 13, pp. 79- 95 ,(1995) , 10.1068/C130079