Does elective caesarean section increase utilization of postpartum maternal medical care
作者： Tsai-Ching Liu , Chin-Shyan Chen , Herng-Ching Lin
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0B013E31816493E9
关键词:
摘要: Background There have been no studies that quantitatively assess postpartum maternal medical care utilization for elective caesarean section (CS) versus vaginal delivery procedures. Methods This study used population-based data linked with birth file to explore the association between modes (elective CS vs. delivery) and of (outpatient visits inpatient care) during 6-month postdelivery period. The analysis was restricted term deliveries avoid biased estimation. Results average number outpatient (3.14) slightly higher than (2.87). Similarly, total amount expenditures involved [NT$2811 (US$73.6) NT$2570 (US$71.4)]. likelihood taking place within period also (77% 70%). regression results showed associated significantly compared deliveries. Conclusions Although difference in terms is statistically significant, small magnitude cost (NT$72; US$2.2) suggests it may not be clinically only marginally important from a policy perspective.
elsevier.com
jstor.org 
sci-hub.se 参考文章(17)
George B. Feldman, Jennie A. Freiman, Prophylactic Cesarean Section at Term The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 312, pp. 1264- 1267 ,(1985) , 10.1056/NEJM198505093121926
Tsai-Ching Liu, Chin-Shyan Chen, Yi-Wen Tsai, Herng-Ching Lin, Taiwan's high rate of cesarean births: impacts of national health insurance and fetal gender preference. Birth-issues in Perinatal Care. ,vol. 34, pp. 115- 122 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1523-536X.2007.00157.X
José Villar, Eliette Valladares, Daniel Wojdyla, Nelly Zavaleta, Guillermo Carroli, Alejandro Velazco, Archana Shah, Liana Campodónico, Vicente Bataglia, Anibal Faundes, Ana Langer, Alberto Narváez, Allan Donner, Mariana Romero, Sofia Reynoso, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Daniel Giordano, Marius Kublickas, Arnaldo Acosta, Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America The Lancet. ,vol. 367, pp. 1819- 1829 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7
Marion H Hall, Susan Bewley, Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. The Lancet. ,vol. 354, pp. 776- ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)76016-5
Elina Hemminki, Jouni Meriläinenb, Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems ☆ ☆☆ ★ American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 174, pp. 1569- 1574 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70608-7
Jeffrey L. Ecker, Fredric D. Frigoletto, Cesarean Delivery and the Risk–Benefit Calculus The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 356, pp. 885- 888 ,(2007) , 10.1056/NEJMP068290
Abdul H. Sultan, Stuart L. Stanton, Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth–elective caesarean section? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 103, pp. 731- 734 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1996.TB09864.X
A H Sultan, M A Kamm, C N Hudson, C I Bartram, Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair BMJ. ,vol. 308, pp. 887- 891 ,(1994) , 10.1136/BMJ.308.6933.887
Herng-Ching Lin, Sudha Xirasagar, Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: A 5-year population-based study American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 192, pp. 848- 855 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2004.09.133
Melissa Gilliam, Deborah Rosenberg, Faith Davis, The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 99, pp. 976- 980 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02002-1