does campaign contact influence individuals’ vote choices? an alternative approach

作者: charles pattie , adam whitworth , ron johnston

DOI: 10.1057/EPS.2015.24

关键词:

摘要: Analyses of local campaign effects are dominated by aggregate-level analyses constituency activity. Though individual-level data available on whether voters (or remember being) contacted parties during campaigns, their analysis is fraught with difficulties, not least the extent to which memory contact itself conditioned partly party allegiance, creating a circularity in impact vote choice. To some degree, this can be (and has been) dealt regression framework. However, does fully deal potential difficulties. Ideally, experimental approaches needed tease out definitively exposure individual’s election decisions. these present practical In paper, therefore, we utilise quasi-experimental difference-in-difference and propensity score matching methods estimate at 2010 British General Election from data.

参考文章(47)
H.A. Semetko, P. Norris, M. Scammell, J. Curtice, D. Sanders, On Message: Communicating the Campaign ,(1999)
Paul Whiteley, Marianne C. Stewart, Harold D. Clarke, David Sanders, Political Choice in Britain ,(2004)
Wilkinson Kate, McLennan David, Narrowing the gap? Analysing the impact of the New Deal for Communities Programme on educational attainment Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). ,(2010)
Alan S. Gerber, Donald P. Green, Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout Brookings Institution Press. ,(2015)
Daron R. Shaw, Donald P. Green, James G. Gimpel, Alan S. Gerber, Do Robotic Calls From Credible Sources Influence Voter Turnout or Vote Choice? Evidence From a Randomized Field Experiment Journal of Political Marketing. ,vol. 11, pp. 231- 245 ,(2012) , 10.1080/15377857.2012.724305
Mårten Palme, Costas Meghir, Educational Reform, Ability, and Family Background The American Economic Review. ,vol. 95, pp. 414- 424 ,(2004) , 10.1920/WP.IFS.2004.0410