So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making

作者: Robert S. Baron

DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37004-3

关键词:

摘要: Publisher Summary This chapter introduces a ubiquity model of groupthink or Janis's that specifies revised set antecedent conditions to explain the reason for groupthink-like behavior occurring in mundane, temporary, and even minimal groups yet is not an invariant feature group decision making. It mentions probing insightful analysis historical making was correct about symptoms their relationship outcomes, such as suppression dissent, polarization attitude, poor quality wrong conditions. The frequent failure verify more ambitious predictions regarding causal role played by model's stem from general prevalence consensus seeking, polarization, outgroup stereotyping, dissent wide array settings. After some 30 years investigation, evidence has largely failed support formulation's controversial predictions, specifically those linking certain with phenomena.

参考文章(120)
M. Sherif, A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University). ,(1935)
David G. Myers, Social psychology, 4th ed. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. ,(1993)
Leigh Thompson, John M. Levine, Conflict in groups. The Guilford Press. pp. 745- 776 ,(1996)
Irving Janis, Victims of Groupthink ,(1972)
Cathy McFarland, Dale T. Miller, When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,(1991)
Dominic Abrams, Michael A. Hogg, Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. Harvester Wheatsheaf. ,(1993)
Dorwin Cartwright, Alvin Zander, Group dynamics, 3rd ed. Harper + Row. ,(1968)
Henri Tajfel, John C. Turner, An integrative theory of intergroup conflict The social psychology of intergroup relations. pp. 33- 47 ,(2001)
Michael A Hogg, None, Intergroup relations: An Overview Psychology Press. pp. 1- 14 ,(2001)
Robert S. Baron, Distraction-Conflict Theory: Progress and Problems Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 19, pp. 1- 40 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60211-7