The Landscape of Public Participation on Biotechnology

作者: Edna Einsiedel

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_13

关键词:

摘要: The promotion of public engagement and dialogue has become a mantra for science technology policy discussions in the last several decades. Such calls have been embedded push innovation greater global competitiveness “hurdles” that such efforts met from increasingly unsupportive if not resistant publics. Nowhere this more evident than trajectory biotechnology many different countries. lengthy history development (in contrast to other recent platform technologies) ensuing controversies around some its applications provided which publics ‘participated’ ways. considerable number participation initiatives provides window into both evolution practices as well an examination conditions their use, impacts social learning.

参考文章(90)
Barry Bozeman, Daniel Sarewitz, Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation Minerva. ,vol. 49, pp. 1- 23 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11024-011-9161-7
Helge Torgersen, Alexander Bogner, Austria's agri-biotechnology regulation: political consensus despite divergent concepts of precaution Science and Public Policy. ,vol. 32, pp. 277- 284 ,(2005) , 10.3152/147154305781779407
John S. Dryzek, Aviezer Tucker, Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States Public Administration Review. ,vol. 68, pp. 864- 876 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1540-6210.2008.00928.X
Christophe Bonneuil, Pierre-Benoit Joly, Claire Marris, Disentrenching Experiment The Construction of GM-Crop Field Trials As a Social Problem Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 33, pp. 201- 229 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0162243907311263
Simon Joss, Sergio Bellucci, Participatory technology assessment: European perspectives Centre for Study of Democracy, University of Westminster. ,(2002)