Using and writing reviews to inform your practice

作者: Maria J. Grant , Anthea Sutton

DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00928.X

关键词:

摘要: Reviews are seen as a way of exploiting existing data or research findings more fully and can offer summarised insight into the current understanding evidence. Library information science (LIS) workers use reviews to inform their decision-making service planning. Although LIS evidence base continues grow there will frequently be times when no published available. In these instances, you may consider undertaking your own review. Different types review require different approaches and, by deciding from outset what kind yours be, methodology. Guidelines on writing for Health Information Libraries Journal presented.

参考文章(10)
Jonathan D. Eldredge, Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics. Journal of The Medical Library Association. ,vol. 92, pp. 83- 90 ,(2004)
Michelle Maden-Jenkins, Healthcare librarians and the delivery of critical appraisal training: barriers to involvement Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 33- 40 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00922.X
Rachel Chan, Vivian Stieda, Evaluation of three point-of-care healthcare databases: BMJ Point-of-Care, Clin-eguide and Nursing Reference Centre Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 50- 58 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00920.X
Alison Brettle, Michelle Maden-Jenkins, Lucy Anderson, Rosalind McNally, Tracey Pratchett, Jenny Tancock, Debra Thornton, Anne Webb, Evaluating clinical librarian services: a systematic review Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 3- 22 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00925.X
Maura G. Flynn, Claire McGuinness, Hospital clinicians’ information behaviour and attitudes towards the ‘Clinical Informationist’: an Irish survey Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 23- 32 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00917.X
Kamolthip Atsawawaranunt, Clive E Adams, Samantha Roberts, Searching for randomised controlled trials and clinical controlled trials in Thai online bibliographical biomedical databases Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 68- 76 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00916.X
Maria J. Grant, Andrew Booth, A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies Health Information and Libraries Journal. ,vol. 26, pp. 91- 108 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2009.00848.X
Liz Brewster, Barbara Sen, ‘Quality signposting’: the role of online information prescription in providing patient information Health Information & Libraries Journal. ,vol. 28, pp. 59- 67 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1471-1842.2010.00912.X