作者: Louisa W Whitesides , Jill M Baren , Michelle H Biros , Ross J Fleischman , Prasanthi R Govindarajan
关键词:
摘要: Background:Evidence suggests that patients are generally accepting of their enrollment in trials for emergency care conducted under exception from informed consent. It is unknown whether individuals with more severe initial injuries or worse clinical outcomes have different perspectives. Determining these differences exist may help to structure post-enrollment interactions.Methods:Primary data the Progesterone Treatment Traumatic Brain Injury trial were matched interview Patients’ Experiences Emergency Research–Progesterone study. Answers three key questions study analyzed context enrolled patients’ injury severity (initial Glasgow Coma Scale and Severity Score) principal (Extended Outcome Extended relative in...